Untitled edit

Being a wikifairy. However I don't understand " upregulated by direct insult "... 203.218.86.162 15:07, 6 June 2006 (UTC)Reply

Proposed merger with 'Aquaporins' article edit

As far as I can tell, these articles are about the same group of proteins found in the cell membrane. They both contain different information on the same tyopic, and so i suggest that they should be merged. -Snellios 22:26, 21 June 2006 (UTC)Reply

The artcles have now been merged, and a clean-up is required. Snellios 16:45, 24 June 2006 (UTC)Reply

most of this information is stolen edit

half of this article copies www.answers.com/topic/aquaporin and does not cite it....

No, Answers.com displays information from wikipedia, it even says near the top of the page "Home > Library > Reference > Wikipedia" Murdochious 17:21, 5 November 2007 (UTC)Reply

There are hidden vandalism edit

Somebody has been replacing the original texts by related articles. This makes the information that appears to the reader unrelated to the topic and weird, but true, and makes very difficult to detect vandalism.

The IP of the vandal is 72.73.52.114 and if you check his history, he has destroyed also other pages. I don't know how to block his IP. If somebody knows, would be good to do it.

Pictures edit

More pictures would be useful! Myrmeleon formicarius 00:40, 29 January 2007 (UTC)Reply

PyMOL image is an 'incorrect' portrayal edit

The PyMOL image is 'upside down.' It is kind of arbitrary if you are knowledgeable regarding the tetramer organization in the membrane, otherwise it may be misleading. Usually when portraying proteins in a side view, the 'top' should signify the extracellular space and the 'bottom' the cytoplasmic/intracellular space. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 68.149.162.144 (talk) 12:17, 10 April 2007 (UTC).Reply

NPA motif and proton blockage edit

I updated the section on the NPA motif which was outdated and which reflected only the view of a part of the aquaporin community. In particular, the interpretation that the "bipolar" water orientation causes proton blockage is now expressed as one of several opinions. In fact, there are several studies published (I know of four) which highly question this early interpretation. In addition I added the reference to the first paper which reported the rotation of water molecules. --Hanuta3001 (talk) 15:34, 26 July 2008 (UTC)Reply

Applications to Water Purification edit

Should add a section about water purification systems that incorporate aquaporins Aquaporin company: http://www.aquaporin.dk/ (say by 2013 they will commercially available)

There are lots of papers on the subject too, e.g. [1] CrocodilesAreForWimps (talk) 03:28, 1 November 2012 (UTC)Reply

  1. ^ Sun, Guofei (1). "Stabilization and immobilization of aquaporin reconstituted lipid vesicles for water purification". Colloids and Surfaces B: Biointerfaces. 102: 466–471. PMID 23022601. {{cite journal}}: |access-date= requires |url= (help); Check date values in: |date= and |year= / |date= mismatch (help); Unknown parameter |month= ignored (help)

External links modified edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Aquaporin. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

 Y An editor has reviewed this edit and fixed any errors that were found.

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 07:07, 28 February 2016 (UTC)Reply

Assessment comment edit

The comment(s) below were originally left at Talk:Aquaporin/Comments, and are posted here for posterity. Following several discussions in past years, these subpages are now deprecated. The comments may be irrelevant or outdated; if so, please feel free to remove this section.

This article is the result of a recent merger between two older articles. As a result, it is basically just two articles on one page. Needs a full going-over. – ClockworkSoul 21:40, 2 October 2006 (UTC)Reply

Last edited at 21:40, 2 October 2006 (UTC). Substituted at 08:07, 29 April 2016 (UTC)

External links modified edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Aquaporin. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

 Y An editor has reviewed this edit and fixed any errors that were found.

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 18:02, 31 May 2016 (UTC)Reply

Who's Solomon? edit

The History section has a sentence, that starts "Solomon and his co-workers performed pioneering work", but there's no previous mention of Solomon. There are a couple of footnotes to AK Solomon, but I think Solomon needs more introduction in the body. ChrisHibbert (talk) 18:12, 28 October 2017 (UTC)Reply

A Commons file used on this page has been nominated for deletion edit

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page has been nominated for deletion:

Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 08:51, 11 July 2019 (UTC)Reply