Talk:Aquafaba

Latest comment: 8 months ago by 2A00:23C6:148A:9B01:5CC2:3A4:6DEB:972 in topic Salt in canned chickpeas liquid

Scientific Consensus edit

How does Aquafaba mimic egg whites so well? The first line of the article says "because of its function as an emulsifier, leavening agent, and foaming agent." But later, the says that there's no scientific consensus. That's a really simple and satisfying scientific explanation to me, so what exactly is missing from the consensus? Does that statement just mean that we don't have a series of studies proving a scientific law stating that Aquafaba is chemically similar to egg whites? Or is it complete bullshit? Daniel J. Hakimi (talk) 15:08, 8 February 2016 (UTC)Reply

How much fiber does this have? It looks to me like the gelling is a product ofwater soluble fiber. this idea of emusifier is odd, unless fiber is an emulsifier....? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jawnn (talkcontribs) 18:05, 28 September 2019 (UTC)Reply

External links modified edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to 6 external links on Aquafaba. Please take a moment to review my edit. You may add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it, if I keep adding bad data, but formatting bugs should be reported instead. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether, but should be used as a last resort. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

 Y An editor has reviewed this edit and fixed any errors that were found.

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 18:34, 30 March 2016 (UTC)Reply

Egg Replacement Uses edit

The duplex sentence about the Aqua-stuff used in Egg Replacements Application as substitutes for dairy, cheese (also dairy?) and meat should be better explained. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 144.183.224.2 (talk) 01:00, 2 June 2016 (UTC)Reply

Reference 32 is broken edit

The article "Aquafaba, what is its chemical composition?" is not there. -PelicanTwo (talk) 14:52, 22 August 2016 (UTC)Reply

External links modified edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Aquafaba. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 06:21, 8 July 2017 (UTC)Reply

Oxford English Dictionary edit

The online edition of the OED does not contain an entry for aquafaba, nor for faba. And the entry for aqua lists some compounds, but not this one. I think the reference needs to be deleted. ABehrens (talk) 20:24, 15 July 2022 (UTC)Reply

Salt in canned chickpeas liquid edit

The image suggests using the liquid from the can when the pre-cooked chickpeas are drained, while the article is largely about re-use of cooking liquid when using dried chickpeas. In some cases (8 out of 10 in one study[1]), the liquid from cans will be extremely high in salt, which may affect its potential use directly, as well as the results of foaming aquafaba. Is it worth mentioning this? 2A00:23C6:148A:9B01:5CC2:3A4:6DEB:972 (talk) 11:09, 31 August 2023 (UTC)Reply