Talk:April in Quahog/GA1

Latest comment: 14 years ago by Xtzou in topic GA Review

GA Review edit

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Xtzou (Talk) 17:06, 16 May 2010 (UTC)Reply

  • The is a well written article. I have only a few comments:
Plot
  • "However, he and his children share no common interests and Peter only makes things worse by using the methamphetamine he had wanted to share with Chris." - uses it for what?
Cultural references
  • "Peter is confronted by Brian who reveals that the only reason he was selected was due to the fact that he had only voted in the last election." - does it mean that the only election he ever voted in was the last election?
    • Yes, are you trying to indicate something?
  • "Peter goes on to state that he actually stuffed the ballot box at the Oscars, when the nominees included Grover from Sesame Street, Bluto from Popeye, and Daniel Day-Lewis, among others. Actress Anne Hathaway presented the award." - I don't see the connection.
    • The sequence immediately followed the election comment. There's no more connection present in the article than what was present in the episode. Gage (talk) 21:22, 16 May 2010 (UTC)Reply
  • "Going on to find out that everyone is asked to do jury duty" - does his mean "Learning the everyone is asked to do jury duty..."? How is this like being kicked out of Coldplay?
    • I didn't write the episode, that's just the reference that was made. Gage (talk) 21:22, 16 May 2010 (UTC)Reply
  • "Further attempting to be kicked out, Peter begins singing the song" - is this referring to jury duty?
    • Fixed.

Otherwise, everything seems fine.

Xtzou (Talk) 17:06, 16 May 2010 (UTC)Reply

GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria

  1. Is it reasonably well written?
    A. Prose quality:   Good
    B. MoS compliance:   Complies with basic MoS
  2. Is it factually accurate and verifiable?
    A. References to sources:   Reliable sources
    B. Citation of reliable sources where necessary:   Well referenced
    C. No original research:  
  3. Is it broad in its coverage?
    A. Major aspects:   Sets the context
    B. Focused:   Remains focused on the subject
  4. Is it neutral?
    Fair representation without bias:  
  5. Is it stable?
    No edit wars, etc:  
  6. Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?
    A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:  
    B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:  
  7. Overall:
    Pass or Fail: Pass!  

Congratulations! Xtzou (Talk) 22:37, 16 May 2010 (UTC)Reply