Is this the same Applix that produced Applixware? edit

If so, I think that should be added to the article.--NapoliRoma (talk) 19:29, 1 August 2008 (UTC)Reply

Yes, but they spun off the Applixware product line around the turn of the century[when?]. I do not have details. Ningauble (talk) 05:29, 9 August 2008 (UTC)Reply
I gave up too soon... a few minutes later I found some apparently current[when?] info on the fate of Applixware at http://www.vistasource.com/en/company.php Ningauble (talk) 05:44, 9 August 2008 (UTC)Reply

I still have no idea what the heck this is. edit

This article might be more useful if it included fewer industry boffin-words rendering it less esoteric. I'm *IN* the IT industry and that I cannot rely on the Wiki to make things clear is, well, disappointing. Shouldn't articles be designed for common or garden variety readers, rather than industry insiders who understand the terminology. (Yes, this diatribe was, in part, sponsored by the equally-obtuse MOLAP article.) fwiw 58.165.32.222 (talk) 11:06, 3 February 2010 (UTC)Reply

"Latest version" of TM1 is out of date and is likely to quickly get that way again edit

Particularly as this is repeated (and up-to-date on the TM1 page itself. Would it be better to just remove this? Nawab (talk) 10:19, 8 June 2011 (UTC)Reply

Information about product developments after the company became defunct probably do not belong here any more than recent developments in lighting technology belong in the Thomas Edison article. ~ Ningauble (talk) 16:01, 8 June 2011 (UTC)Reply