Talk:Apple TV/GA2

Latest comment: 15 years ago by Unionhawk in topic GA Review

GA Review

edit

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
Hello. I will be reviewing this article. Be aware that the process may take up to a week for me to get a thorough review. I know you have been waiting patiently, as I saw this at the back of the GAN backlog. Please be patient to allow me to give a thorough review. Thank you.--Unionhawk Talk E-mail 18:30, 31 August 2009 (UTC)Reply

Preliminary Comments

edit

Criteria

edit
GA review (see here for criteria)

I am placing this article on hold pending the fixing of one {{fact}} tag in the "Remote Control" section. References are important!--Unionhawk Talk E-mail 21:27, 1 September 2009 (UTC)Reply

  1. It is reasonably well written.
    a (prose):   b (MoS):  
    minor MoS issues, such as: date linking. Minor prose issues, such as use of contractions, but, these issues aren't enough for me to fail the article on this criterion.
  2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.
    a (references):   b (citations to reliable sources):   c (OR):  
    1 {{fact}} tag found in Remote Control section.
  3. It is broad in its coverage.
    a (major aspects):   b (focused):  
  4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.
    Fair representation without bias:  
  5. It is stable.
    No edit wars, etc.:  
  6. It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
    a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales):   b (appropriate use with suitable captions):  
  7. Overall:
    Pass/Fail:  
    On hold for one fact tag, which can be easily fixed.
I edited that paragraph. Parts of it were old news - meaning some of the challenges were corrected with later software updates. And frankly I could not find a reliable source (e.g., aside from forums and hacker sites) that mentioned the limitations of the remote. To a a degree, it's a little like people complaining that a Porsche 911 doesn't get good gas mileage when towing a trailer. Sure the limited remote comes up, but it's tangential to the core of the article and the appliance.Mattnad (talk) 23:33, 3 September 2009 (UTC)Reply

Warrior4321's comments

edit

I'd like to add a few things that were not mentioned. Warrior4321 03:38, 2 September 2009 (UTC)Reply

  • The Wikilink Jeff Carlson leads to a disambiguation page.
  • The lead's second paragraph needs to be expanded, as the article constitutes of 33336 characters currently. According to WP:LEAD, the article should have two to three paragraphs.
  • Reference 127 is dead.