Talk:Appeal
 | This  level-4 vital article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||
| |||||||||||
 | This article follows the Wikipedia:Manual of Style/Legal. It uses the Bluebook legal referencing style. This citation style uses standardized abbreviations, such as "N.Y. Times" for The New York Times, and has specific typeface formatting requirements. Please review those standards before making style or formatting changes. Information on this referencing style may be obtained at: Cornell's Basic Legal Citation site. |
Additions by User:Jz1234567 edit
@DissidentAggressor: I didn't notice any specific factual errors in the changes to this article. Can you explain why you removed the content that was added by User:Jz1234567? Jarble (talk) 06:01, 19 May 2015 (UTC)
- I think I understand the problem now: one of the additions includes a source that is not considered reliable. Jarble (talk) 06:02, 19 May 2015 (UTC)
- @Jarble: Yeah, that editor appears to only be here to promote lauderdalecriminaldefense.com. The Dissident Aggressor 13:08, 19 May 2015 (UTC)
Article Overhaul edit
I am currently in the process of overhauling this article. I will return over the next few days to continue developing this. Feel free to pitch in if you like -- I plan to add discussion about the "originalist"/"living constitution" debate and the role of appellate judges in the judicial system. Notecardforfree (talk) 04:50, 28 June 2015 (UTC)
Globalize edit
Beyond the history section there's hardly any specific examples of how courts of appeal works in civil law systems. Moreover, all the specific examples only mention the USA. It also mentions juries despite the fact that plenty of legal systems never (or at least very rarely) use juries and all (or nearly all) criminal or civil cases are only handled by judge(s). Either the article should be slightly reworded to avoid common-law/USA bias or how other justice systems handle appeals need to showcase. 95.155.235.73 (talk) 20:04, 27 May 2016 (UTC)
- That's something I've been meaning to do for a long time. If you have sources that discuss appellate law and procedure in civil law countries, please feel free to add that information. Best, -- Notecardforfree (talk) 21:20, 27 May 2016 (UTC)
External links modified edit
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 5 external links on Appeal. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20150723141606/http://www.supremecourt.gov/ctrules/2013RulesoftheCourt.pdf to http://www.supremecourt.gov/ctrules/2013RulesoftheCourt.pdf/
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20150723141606/http://www.supremecourt.gov/ctrules/2013RulesoftheCourt.pdf to http://www.supremecourt.gov/ctrules/2013RulesoftheCourt.pdf/
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20150723141606/http://www.supremecourt.gov/ctrules/2013RulesoftheCourt.pdf to http://www.supremecourt.gov/ctrules/2013RulesoftheCourt.pdf/
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20150723141606/http://www.supremecourt.gov/ctrules/2013RulesoftheCourt.pdf to http://www.supremecourt.gov/ctrules/2013RulesoftheCourt.pdf/
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20150723141606/http://www.supremecourt.gov/ctrules/2013RulesoftheCourt.pdf to http://www.supremecourt.gov/ctrules/2013RulesoftheCourt.pdf/
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 14:26, 16 October 2016 (UTC)
sorry i can’t donate edit
I don’t have money 2603:7000:8401:5F67:49C9:9E52:7DD2:30AB (talk) 18:05, 18 December 2022 (UTC)
Writ of error edit
Writ of error links redirect to this page. Perhaps a definition of a "writ of error" and how it relates to the legal appeals process would be helpful. Stian (talk) 13:12, 26 March 2023 (UTC)
"Writ of error" listed at Redirects for discussion edit
The redirect Writ of error has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Readers of this page are welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 July 10 § Writ of error until a consensus is reached. -- 'zin[is short for Tamzin] (she|they|xe) 20:42, 10 July 2023 (UTC)