Talk:Apollinarism
New Adventus Spiritum edit
I made Two Corrections. The first is, New Advent does not say "that Jesus had a normal human body but a divine mind instead of a regular human soul."
Rather, it says this.
"A Christological theory, according to which Christ had a human body and a human sensitive soul, but no human rational mind, the Divine Logos taking the place of this last."
The Soul and Spirit are not the same Thing. Which is also what I corrected in The Body replacing or with and. To make this Clear as it is not sell understood today.
SKWills (talk) 20:10, 10 September 2021 (UTC)
Wiliam Lane Craig edit
The assertion that Dr William Lane Craig holds neo-Apollinarian views appears to be an unwarranted and contentious slur. The reference to the Lane Craig and Moreland book does not in itself provide warrant for this assertion, absent a reference showing that the book in question does advance neo-Apollinarian views. If the assertion cannot be substantiated, then it should be deleted. Spivoxity (talk) 23:04, 17 December 2016 (UTC)
- To be fair, this article http://www.reasonablefaith.org/christological-conundrums on Craig's website does describe his view as 'neo-Apollinarian'. Spivoxity (talk) 23:08, 17 December 2016 (UTC)
- I gather that needs further clarification. As far as I know, Dr. William Lane Craig does not deny that human nature is made of body and soul. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 81.193.184.192 (talk) 23:02, 21 August 2023 (UTC)