Talk:Aphrissa statira

Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment

This article is or was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): EmilyKathryn. Peer reviewers: Mlopez2121, Crieber.

Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT (talk) 14:31, 16 January 2022 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Aphrissa statira. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added {{dead link}} tag to http://www.catalogueoflife.org/show_species_details.php?record_id=6107695
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20091104100719/http://users.ox.ac.uk/~zool0206/AnimBeh06.pdf to http://users.ox.ac.uk/~zool0206/AnimBeh06.pdf

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 10:24, 16 October 2016 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Aphrissa statira. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20080720133413/http://www.nearctica.com/butter/plate5/Pstatir.htm to http://www.nearctica.com/butter/plate5/Pstatir.htm

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 23:33, 7 July 2017 (UTC)

Expanding the Article

As part of my Behavioral Ecology class at Washington University, I significantly expanded this page. I added to the lead section and expanded the existing sections. I also added several new relevant sections and many new sources. EmilyKathryn (talk) 21:41, 29 October 2017 (UTC)

Peer Review

This was a great article. Most of my edits were basic grammatical or spelling changes to improve the reading experience. I also was able to add a bunch of links to relevant Wikipedia pages that were mentioned in writing. My only major critique would be the inclusion of the conservation section. There is no need for this and I would strongly suggest removing it since conservation is not mentioned elsewhere in the article and there are no current conservations needs or efforts from what the page presents.Moid.ali (talk) 23:19, 29 October 2017 (UTC)

Peer review

Hi! I thought that this page was very thorough and had good, detailed information. I made a couple of edits as I read through the article. I added some hyperlinks throughout the article and removed several hyperlinks that did not work. Additionally, I changed around the sentence structure and wording to help some of the paragraphs flow better, and I fixed any grammatical errors that I caught. One suggestion I had was for the Caterpillars section of Social behavior—I thought it might be helpful to expand on the two different forms of larvae that is mentioned. I think it would be helpful to expand upon what two forms exist and how the different forms effect the plant host preference that is mentioned. Additionally, I was slightly confused where it states “They may cluster into dense populations to take advantage of the safety that comes with large numbers. The diversity of caterpillar species in the area can help divert predators to other species.” Do the caterpillars form large populations with only members of their own species, or do they form groups with caterpillars from related species as well? I also agree with Moid.ali’s comment, and do not think that the conservation section is necessary, but the conservation status could be briefly mentioned in the introduction. Thank you for contributing so much to this article, it looks great! Mlopez2121 (talk) 13:32, 30 October 2017 (UTC)