Talk:Apex, Iqaluit

Requested move

The following discussion is an archived discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: page moved per discussion below. - GTBacchus^(talk) 19:18, 11 January 2011 (UTC)

---

Apex, Nunavut → Apex, Iqaluit — The current title follows the naming convention for independent communities. However, as per Iqaluit unveils proposals for new facilities ("anywhere in town, including Apex, in a very short period of time,") and Four vie for Iqaluit mayor ("On voting day, polling stations will be at the Cadet Hall and the Abe Okpik Hall in Apex.") the place is actually a part of Iqaluit and a better and correct title would be Apex, Iqaluit. --Enter CBW, waits for audience applause, not a sausage. 12:39, 21 December 2010 (UTC)

Oppose per Bellevue, Washington (not Bellevue, Seattle), Anaheim, California (not Anaheim, Los Angeles), Richmond, British Columbia (not Richmond, Vancouver). Suburbs are, by definition, legally recognized as separate cities by their governments. Those that aren't are called neighborhoods, quarters, districts or boroughs. Suburbs on Wikipedia are never disambiguated with the major city, but with the state or province or country. D O N D E groovily Talk to me 07:13, 26 December 2010 (UTC)

I think that "suburb" is the wrong definition for Apex and have changed it to reflect that. Bellevue, Anaheim and Richmond all appear to have their own mayor and council. Apex has neither a separate mayor or council, see this. Nor is Apex recognised as a separate community by either the Government of Nunavut or the Government of Canada. Enter CBW, waits for audience applause, not a sausage. 18:23, 26 December 2010 (UTC)

What CBW said. Suburbs are, in fact, often disambiguated with the name of their city when they are not a separate municipality. --Skeezix1000 (talk) 13:08, 27 December 2010 (UTC)

• Support, as per neighbourhood naming-convention at WP:CANSTYLE. --Skeezix1000 (talk) 13:08, 27 December 2010 (UTC)

• Support per CBW's arguments above.--Kotniski (talk) 14:23, 29 December 2010 (UTC)

Oppose as the community has a historic significance separate from the larger nearby City which would be lost in this transfer. Apex also has a legally separate District Authority and 5 pages of related legislation when searched in the relevant data base: http://www.justice.gov.nu.ca/apps/search/docSearch.aspx?archived=0&what=Apex+&fields=all&search=%28PATH+like+%27%25%5CConsolidated+Law%5C%25%5C%25%5C%25%27+OR+PATH+like+%27%25%5CGazette%5CPart-II%5C%25%27%29&sort=rank&dir=asc&allLang=1

65.181.34.124 (talk) 20:05, 6 January 2011 (UTC)

Just to be clear, you do understand that I don't want to merge this into the Iqaluit article but change the name so that it is consistent with other Canadian subdivisions (Oliver, Edmonton, Riverdale, Edmonton) that do not have a unique name. No material would be lost at all. By the way most of the documents in the link are mentions of the Apex DEA, amendments to prior legislation and street address for business in Apex. Also there are at least three documents there that show Apex as not being separate from Iqaluit, Building 3044 (Apex) Iqaluit, The boundaries of the Apex Education District are the same as the boundaries of that portion of the Town of Iqaluit known as Apex. and The boundaries of the Iqaluit Education District are the same as the boundaries of the Town of Iqaluit excluding that portion of the town known as Apex.. Enter CBW, waits for audience applause, not a sausage. 22:13, 6 January 2011 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Apex, Iqaluit. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20141211185403/http://www.city.iqaluit.nu.ca/i18n/english/history.html to http://www.city.iqaluit.nu.ca/i18n/english/history.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 23:05, 7 July 2017 (UTC)