Talk:Apdex
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||
|
Example
editWhere does the value of 12 seconds come from in the example? Is it arbitrarily defined by the app developer? Is it 4 * TARGETED_TIME? Something else? (NULL): yes, it is 4 * TARGETED_TIME (which is 3) — Preceding unsigned comment added by 12.149.7.248 (talk) 12:35, 10 October 2014 (UTC)
"Apdex Method"
editThis section reads more like an advertisement than a wikipedia article:
"Proponents of the Apdex standard believe that it offers a better way to measure what matters." (emphasis original) I don't see how the beliefs of proponents are relevant in any way to how the metric is calculated.
"So it is easy to see how this ratio is always directly related to users' perceptions of satisfactory application responsiveness." Not really? The method for calculating the score is glossed over here, and there's no info on which measurements are taken into account, or how these quantities are measured.
External links modified
editHello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Apdex. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20100613144557/http://apdex.org:80/blog/? to http://apdex.org/blog/
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}
).
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 09:15, 16 October 2016 (UTC)