Talk:Antony Wassermann
Latest comment: 1 year ago by 2A01:4B00:9D42:6E00:80B5:136B:1719:735D in topic Sources for affiliation
| This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||
| |||||||||||
 | The following Wikipedia contributor has declared a personal or professional connection to the subject of this article. Relevant policies and guidelines may include conflict of interest, autobiography, and neutral point of view.
|
COI tag (June 2022) edit
According to this the subject is the advisor of the creator of the page. 0xDeadbeef 13:46, 17 June 2022 (UTC)
- Definitely connected with the subject, but he didn't keep it a secret. I'm looking through the WP:COI policy. It looks like they even went through the AFC process [1] as recommended by WP:COIEDIT. Mason (talk) 18:19, 19 June 2022 (UTC)
Sources for affiliation edit
The source for his Cambridge affiliation is Researchgate (unreliable) and this [2], which is from 2000. Is there a recent reliable source? Otherwise it should be removed. 2A01:4B00:9D42:6E00:80B5:136B:1719:735D (talk) 17:56, 16 October 2022 (UTC)