Talk:Anthropos (journal)

Removal of text with sources

@Randykitty: Dear colleague, I am puzzled by the removal of Content and circulation section from the article. The information is 100% uncontroversial IMHO (publication statistics), so an article in a peer-reviewed journal should be OK as a source, even if the information is about the same journal. Викидим (talk) 17:26, 2 November 2023 (UTC)

• Nope, not if it's the same journal. For this kind of info, you need an independent source. --Randykitty (talk) 17:37, 2 November 2023 (UTC)

  (1) Per your request, I have added an independent confirmation of the size of the volume in pages. Still, you have removed it again. So, I would ask you a simple question: is there any way that will be acceptable to you to add the information about the date the new issue comes out and the number of pages in it? (2) I do not consider such information to be "trivia", by the way: number of pages per year (and per article) is a perfectly relevant information about an academic journal (cf. RSC Advances, Hydrobiologia, Malacologia, Applied Physics Express - these are few examples that did not take any time to find). Викидим (talk) 02:42, 3 November 2023 (UTC)

  After some considerations I have decided that this subject is not worth the time we had already spent: I in particular do not care much about Anthropos (created the article after noticing a cool journal name while editing Ahmadzai (Ghilji clan)) and have way too many other subjects to write about. Therefore I am not looking for an explanation anymore. Thank you for the discussion! --Викидим (talk) 06:14, 3 November 2023 (UTC)