Talk:Anthony D. Romero/Archive 1

Archive 1

Untitled

I love the ACLU, but this article reads like it was taken from a brochure. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Spartacus007 (talk • contribs). This article certainly sounds like it was written by a loyal member and proud advocate of the ACLU.45.49.15.207 (talk) 19:31, 16 July 2018 (UTC)

Plagarism

The entire article had been plagarized from the ACLU's web site. [1] I removed the offending contents and made the article a stub again. --Rookkey 19:45, 24 July 2005 (UTC)

Slimmer face

http://aclu.blssba.org/images/romero.jpg

no mention of controversy?

Was it last year or the year before that there was an internal document with several controversial provisions endorsed by romero, including "A director may publicly disagree with an ACLU policy position, but may not criticize the ACLU board and staff." and "[board members] should refrain from publicly highlighting" any disagreement with the organization's policies, in part because public dissent could hurt the ACLU's "public support and fund-raising."

There doesn't seem to be mention of this on either this page or the ACLU page?

-dialectric — Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.41.96.9 (talk • contribs) October 8, 2006 (UTC)

Ditto that. A confusing omission; the (also rather stubby) article on Wendy Kaminer mentions her opposition to Romero - but nothing about these issues here.

"In his capacity as ACLU head, he opposes the Bush administration's execution of the campaign against international terrorism." -- that's badly worded, and seems a tad tendentious. (implying that the ACLU is against combatting terrorism) Better might be "under his leadership, the ACLU has opposed what it sees as the Bush administration's drastic curtailment of civil liberties in its campaign against terrorism." — Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.90.17.134 (talk • contribs) July 4, 2007 (UTC)

File:ACLU Anthony D Romero.jpg Nominated for speedy Deletion

An image used in this article, File:ACLU Anthony D Romero.jpg, has been nominated for speedy deletion for the following reason: All Wikipedia files with unknown copyright status What should I do? Don't panic; you should have time to contest the deletion (although please review deletion guidelines before doing so). The best way to contest this form of deletion is by posting on the image talk page. If the image is non-free then you may need to provide a fair use rationale If the image isn't freely licensed and there is no fair use rationale, then it cannot be uploaded or used. If the image has already been deleted you may want to try Deletion Review This notification is provided by a Bot --CommonsNotificationBot (talk) 15:41, 26 August 2011 (UTC)