| This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Anthodon (plant) article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
| Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Sources edit
Pretty much any and all mentions I can find of this genus are very minor (which is fine), but almost all from the 1800s. This page implies there's a bunch more, but I don't know. Just some food for thought. ~ Amory (u • t • c) 04:28, 9 October 2009 (UTC)
- There are not really other species. In fact, there might be only one. I will add a section to the article to explain that. 128.171.106.205 (talk) 00:27, 10 October 2009 (UTC)
I have put in information which i would not have if it had been at Celastraceae. I felt that this was alot easier than trying to rewrite "Celastraceae", which needs to be expanded, but that would be a major project. I hope that someone is up to it. It should be alot easier after another phylogeny paper or two comes out. 128.171.106.205 (talk) 00:37, 10 October 2009 (UTC)