Talk:Annuity/Archives/2015
 | This page is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Notation
I find the use of notation heavy-handed in this article. The same content could be presented more clearly without any use of actuarial notation. This material has wider importance in finance outside the actuarial context. I therefore suggest a substantial re-write to remove the actuarial notation. I can see the use of a reference to actuarial notation, but reliance upon it for the whole body of the article makes it less readable than it would be without the actuarial notation.
Jonathan G. G. Lewis 06:57, 18 November 2013 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jonazo (talk • contribs)
- I disagree. The notation stays, while it could still be explained more clearly. — LlywelynII 06:50, 13 June 2015 (UTC)
PRIMARYTOPIC
This is it. It eventually needs to move back to annuity and have talk:Annuity merged with the content here that was (wrongly) previously forked from it. — LlywelynII 06:50, 13 June 2015 (UTC)
What is "annuitization"?
It redirects here. There's also a verb "annuitize". What do they mean, in layman's terms? Equinox (talk) 03:37, 12 July 2015 (UTC)
Life annuity
@Jfhutson: can we come up with a better description of a life annuity than one that's paid while the recipient is alive? That is hopelessly vague and inappropriate for a lede section. I made an attempt by adding a second line to the lede with a description but you've reverted me. Ivanvector 🍁 (talk) 18:27, 4 November 2015 (UTC)