Talk:Annobón

Latest comment: 7 years ago by Error in topic 1932

Comments

edit

I guess this highlights a need for articles on São Tomé Island (and Príncipe Island as well).

Note that the coordinates on the map of Annobon are wrong: 1°23' is located UNDER 1°25, while this is southern hemisphere --> the 1°23' should read 1°27'S

Well spotted, 137.224.252.10! Though I think the lines of latitude, 1°23' and 1°25', are correct but should be reversed. That is 1°23' above, and 1°25' below. Unfortunately, I don't think we can edit the image. Kahuzi 15:59, 22 September 2006 (UTC)Reply

Annobón spanish article Wikipedia

edit

Somebody must put in english, is better. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 212.97.173.27 (talk) 00:50, 19 December 2006 (UTC).Reply

maybe in Spanish empire

edit

The isle were in spanish empire despite portuguese language 82.198.32.236 00:13, 27 December 2006 (UTC)Reply

The "history" section of the article does make it clear that Annobón was, indeed, part of a colony within the Spanish empire. Kahuzi 23:32, 27 December 2006 (UTC)Reply

Conflicting population figures

edit

The Portuguese version of this article says that the population is 2,000. This article currently says 5,000. All other things being equal I would be more inclined to believe the Portuguese article, and data at [1] gives the density at 120/km² which is consistent with a figure of 2,000. However, I can't find any other independent sources for the population and I'm not confident enough to change it. It's possible that the figures of 2,000 and 5,000 vary widely in date I guess. Matt 17:20, 23 April 2007 (UTC).

The Spanish Government gives the population data as 5,000 indeed. [2]--Asteriontalk 19:37, 15 August 2007 (UTC)Reply

Reverting messy edits

edit

A series of edits in September 2011 destroyed the original structure of the article. Some new information was added, but much of it was written in poor English and badly organised. I have reverted to the last good version of 15:28, 21 September 2011‎. Any worthwhile information added between that date and the date of this notice needs to be manually extracted, cleaned up, and properly integrated into the article. I will try to pick away at this as I have the time and inclination. 109.151.36.181 (talk) 01:28, 21 November 2011 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 5 external links on Annobón Province. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 00:53, 15 October 2016 (UTC)Reply

1932

edit

While it is a novel, according to this teaser to the book Annobón, in 1932 there were 675 women and 465 men in Annobon, all Africans but for three missionaries, a male nurse and a police sergeant, Restituto Castilla. On the arrival of colonial governor Gustavo de Sostoa, sergeant Castilla murdered the governor. It could be interesting to add something to the history during the colony. --Error (talk) 18:41, 30 March 2017 (UTC)Reply