Talk:Anne Treisman
Anne Treisman was nominated as a Social sciences and society good article, but it did not meet the good article criteria at the time (December 11, 2013). There are suggestions on the review page for improving the article. If you can improve it, please do; it may then be renominated. |
This article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
This article was the subject of an educational assignment in Fall 2013. Further details were available on the "Education Program:University of California, Los Angeles (UCLA)/Psychology 220A (Fall, 2013)" page, which is now unavailable on the wiki. |
Biography assessment rating comment
editWikiProject Biography Summer 2007 Assessment Drive
The article may be improved by following the WikiProject Biography 11 easy steps to producing at least a B article. -- Yamara 07:16, 6 July 2007 (UTC)
Someone should add and link that her daughter b.1970, has been the Fiction Editor at the prestigious magazine, The New Yorker, for many years. I tried to add a mention, but appears not to have gone through. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2600:1700:AD20:F000:78AF:E84:B52C:19EA (talk) 01:36, 8 January 2023 (UTC)
GA Review
editGA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
- This review is transcluded from Talk:Anne Treisman/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.
Reviewer: MusikAnimal (talk · contribs) 02:48, 11 December 2013 (UTC)
Issues
editThe {{BLP sources}} template is a red flag that this article is not ready for GA. Sifting through it appears that is the case. Some specifics:
- Heavily lacking in sources. This is a biography on a living person, so it is especially important to make it well-sourced. Claims like “
This theory was criticized because ...
” and “In 1967 ... she published [a paper] that was central to the development of selective attention as a field of study
” sound likely to be challenged and must be verifiable. Nothing immediately appeared to me to sound libelous, as in such case the claim in question should be removed for legal reasons. - The Feature Integration Theory section may not meet the Wikipedia layout guideline. The sections therein should be done using sectioning markup per MOS:SECTION. The heading should not be wikilinked but a {{main}} template should instead be used – although the linked article does not exist anyway.
- The article may need more links to help integrate it with other articles and the project as a whole.
- Some images or illustrations would be helpful to make the article more appealing. Is there a free picture of her? How about something to help illustrate the Feature Integration Theory?
I have not read through the whole article as it's clear it does not meet GA criteria. I recommend the nominator read over the policy regarding biographies of living persons, and WP:GA? for more about good article criteria. You may also be able to find help at Wikipedia:WikiProject Women scientists.
Quick fail due to lack of references — MusikAnimal talk 03:26, 11 December 2013 (UTC)
External links modified
editHello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Anne Treisman. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20080905025042/http://homepage.psy.utexas.edu/homepage/class/Psy355/Gilden/treisman.pdf to http://homepage.psy.utexas.edu/homepage/class/psy355/gilden/treisman.pdf
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
An editor has reviewed this edit and fixed any errors that were found.
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 18:53, 6 July 2017 (UTC)
External links modified
editHello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Anne Treisman. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20111023215053/http://psych.princeton.edu/psychology/research/treisman/index.php to http://psych.princeton.edu/psychology/research/treisman/index.php
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 08:57, 30 December 2017 (UTC)
Date of death
editWe currently have a difference between the two sources given in the article.APS says: APS Past Secretary Anne Treisman, considered one of the world’s most influential cognitive psychologists, died February 10, 2018" but KTC says: "Anne Treisman, pioneer of perception and attention and namesake of our center, passed away peacefully on February 9, 2018." Which is correct? Should one be removed/ replaced? Thanks. Martinevans123 (talk) 22:53, 13 February 2018 (UTC)
- Also it's usual for a BLP article to have a Later life and/or Death section? Martinevans123 (talk) 22:56, 13 February 2018 (UTC)
A major contributor to this article appears to have a close connection with its subject
editSomeone posted a
A major contributor to this article appears to have a close connection with its subject. (February 2018) |
tag on the article, but neither created an accompanying entry here nor identified what the conflict of interest might be. These deficiencies need to be rectified.Robert P. O'Shea (talk) 21:30, 19 February 2018 (UTC)
- Since the tag was added by an unregistered user with no explanation, I am going to delete the tag pending further information from the tagger. I am open to hearing about the COI and its possible reinstatement. Amuseclio (talk) 01:46, 13 March 2018 (UTC) Amuseclio
A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion
editThe following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:
Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 18:07, 22 March 2022 (UTC)
Children
editSource: BIOGRAPHICAL MEMOIRS OF FELLOWS OF THE ROYAL SOCIETY
This memoir recounts about Anne Treisman having 4 children; Jessica, Daniel, Stephen and Deborah. 2A02:A463:7E9A:1:ADAA:5258:58AE:3843 (talk) 03:45, 23 January 2023 (UTC)