Talk:Annates
Latest comment: 4 months ago by Bricology in topic Lede relies too much on specialized jargon
| This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Annates article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
| Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
 | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Sources for article expansion
editThese were listed in the "References", with no cites to show their use.
- Dickens, A.G. (1964). The English Reformation. New York: Schocken Books.
- Pollard, John F. (2005). Money and the Rise of the Modern Papacy: Financing the Vatican, 1850–1950. Cambridge University Press.
Kindly reinsert them once there are inline citations. — LlywelynII 04:50, 20 June 2015 (UTC)
Lede relies too much on specialized jargon
editWould it be possible for someone to rewrite parts of the lede in plain language? Jargon like "benefice" and "collating" are incomprehensible to most laypersons. Readers should not have to follow links to other articles simply to grasp the outlines of the subject. Thank you. Bricology (talk) 20:26, 25 February 2024 (UTC)