Talk:Anmatjere Community
![]() | This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||
|
No content tag
editI've put in the layout of the page, when the note come up, I hadnt put in the additional information yet. I have no done this and believe that the no-content should be removed, or at least changed to a stub.
External links modified
editHello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Anmatjere Community. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070205151016/http://www.anmatjere.nt.gov.au:80/ to http://www.anmatjere.nt.gov.au/
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}
).
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 12:30, 14 October 2016 (UTC)
Need for linking spelling variations
editI'm just making this note here because I don't have time now, but it doesn't look as if this article and Anmatyerre have appropriate links and redirections. Laterthanyouthink (talk) 08:24, 20 July 2019 (UTC)
- @Laterthanyouthink:, I have the following comments. Anmatjere is the official spelling used by the NT Government in respect to both the Anmatjere Community and the locality gazetted in 2007 - Anmatjere, Northern Territory (which is an article that I started and uploaded today after another editor removed 'red links' in respect to this article from another article]]. I have noticed that the following all redirect to Anmatyerre - Anmatyerr, Anmatjirra, Amatjere and Anmatjera. I recently added a disambiguation page, Anmatyerre (disambiguation), which picks up both Anmatjere Community and Anmatjere, Northern Territory. However, a potential problem is that the disambiguation page contains two different spellings of what is effectively the same word. I have looked at the WP manual of style and was not able to find any mention of such a situation (which is probably not that uncommon) Otherwise, I think all of the articles are now appropriately linked and redirected apart from the possible need for a redirect with the name Anmatjere and adding Anmatyerr, Anmatjirra, Amatjere and Anmatjera to Anmatyerre (disambiguation) under a "See also" heading. Regards Cowdy001 (talk) 08:15, 27 October 2019 (UTC)
- @Cowdy001: - Thanks for doing all of that, that's a great improvement. That DAB page is tricky, with the different spellings - but I think will be fine as it is. I see that the redirect Anmatjere leads straight to Anmatjere Community at the moment, which should probably lead to Anmatyerre (disambiguation) - I will change that. It looks as if the other four that you mention all lead to Anmatyerre, so doesn't that cover them? And on that latter page, I think I'll change it to spell out "For other uses, see Anmatyerre (disambiguation)".
- I've done a few changes now. All very confusing - if what I've said above or done is not clear, or incorrect, please let me know and/or revert! I am now wondering whether it may be better if all of the the main articles about the various groups should have "people" in the title, where appropriate, as the language ones are followed by "language" (e.g. Kaurna people, Kaurna language)... But that is too big a task to look at now, and there may be reasons for why it is the way it is... Laterthanyouthink (talk) 10:07, 27 October 2019 (UTC)