 | This article was nominated for deletion on 14 November 2014 (UTC). The result of the discussion was no consensus. |
| This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Anjli Jain article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
| Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
| This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Speedy deletion edit
This article was previously removed; please see http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Anjli_Jain_Chopra
I am re-nominating this article. Joshua (talk) 02:40, 12 November 2009 (UTC)
Article is being re-nominated for speedy deletion. Seinfreak37 (talk) 17:45, 11 December 2014 (UTC)
Notability from news sources edit
The only news sources I can find about Anjli Jain are press releases either from CampusEAI, or written by Anjli Jain myself. Please post links to other news sources about this person. Joshua (talk) 16:05, 12 November 2009 (UTC)
General problems with this article: self-promotion, lack of references, lack of news sources, lack of notability edit
I've challenging some of the problems I see about this article. I'm giving them 5 days to be corrected, and after that point I plan to remove some of this offending content.
As I'm not a deletionist, I would prefer to see this article improved rather than reduced to a stub or deleted -- please feel free to start discussion of how to improve this article on this talk page, on my talk page, or just get started adding references to this article. Joshua (talk) 16:08, 12 November 2009 (UTC)
There has been no discussion here nor in Historianne123's talk page about some of the problems with this article -- the offending material was simply placed right back. Could we please hold a reasonable discussion about this first before reverting? Thanks. Joshua (talk) 19:20, 2 December 2009 (UTC)