Talk:Aniracetam

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Pharmacology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Pharmacology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PharmacologyWikipedia:WikiProject PharmacologyTemplate:WikiProject Pharmacologypharmacology articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Dietary Supplements

	Aniracetam is part of WikiProject Dietary Supplements, a collaborative attempt at improving the coverage of topics related to dietary supplements. If you would like to participate, you can choose to edit this article, or visit the project page for more information.Dietary SupplementsWikipedia:WikiProject Dietary SupplementsTemplate:WikiProject Dietary SupplementsDietary supplement articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Ideal sources for Wikipedia's health content are defined in the guideline Wikipedia:Identifying reliable sources (medicine) and are typically review articles. Here are links to possibly useful sources of information about Aniracetam.

PubMed provides review articles from the past five years (limit to free review articles)
The TRIP database provides clinical publications about evidence-based medicine.
Other potential sources include: Centre for Reviews and Dissemination and CDC

this article seems to imply that Japanese are not "healthy, unimpaired humans."

(reply to above) I've heard about studies in Japan and came to this page hoping to find a summary/info on this. please add links/summaries in the main article or here. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.249.114.142 (talk) 05:46, 2 April 2008 (UTC)Reply

Weird intro

Latest comment: 11 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

What is the meaning of the third clause of this sentence?

It has been tested in animals extensively, Alzheimer's patients, and temporarily impaired healthy subjects.

It's gramatically vague and also there is no citation for the implication that it "impairs healthy subjects."

I'm pretty close to removing the last part, unless someone has some support as to why it should stay, and if it were to stay, clearer phrasing is needed. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.183.100.70 (talk) 15:11, 4 March 2013 (UTC)Reply

I believe means that it improved cognition in healthy subjects that were temporarily impaired. There are papers concerning a scopolamine model in the literature, but I'm not sure which one this sentence is referring to. Ohnodoctor (talk) 04:51, 7 May 2013 (UTC)Reply

Approved for what?

Latest comment: 1 year ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Is aniracetam approved anywhere for anything? The article says "prescription only" in Australia, but what is it prescribed for? Danski14^(talk) 19:50, 29 January 2023 (UTC)Reply

Add topic