This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Untitled
editI think bakemonogatari was produced by shaft no aniplex — Preceding unsigned comment added by 123.243.51.29 (talk) 03:57, 27 August 2011 (UTC)
External links modified
editHello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Aniplex. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20081102051247/http://www.sonymusic.co.jp:80/Animation/eng/works.html to http://www.sonymusic.co.jp/Animation/eng/works.html
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}
).
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 09:21, 14 October 2016 (UTC)
Licensees in the list?
editWhy are there licensees listed in the list of anime produced by Aniplex? How is this relevant to a discussion about a Japanese production company at all. It's not an article about licensing, and it gives a North American bias as well. Like if a series is licensed, great, that can go on the article itself because it is relevant there. It's not relevant to put it in the list of titles of a producer who does not primarily deal with licensing. This seems like an extremely similar case to Talk:Noitamina#Why is there a North American license column? back in 2019. tenshibeat (talk|contribs) 13:51, 19 June 2021 (UTC)