Talk:Animal Planet/Archive 1
 | This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
| Archive 1 |
US Version vs. Other versions
This article, as with the other domestic Discovery Channel articles, covers the US version of Animal Planet. Versions for other nations should be covered under entries for those separate versions -- just as has been done for other American channels that have overseas counterparts. --Mhking (talk) 05:21, 28 January 2008 (UTC)
- The problem is, the article is not very clear as to what its focus is, Animal Planet as a whole or just the US channel. It needs to be retooled specifically to say that, if its going to be limited to that, and then articles made for all of the others, including Animal Planet Canada, Animal Planet International (AKA UK), and Animal Planet Australia, at the minimum. Right now, it seems to be a combo of Animal Planet US and Animal Planet International, with only Canada appearing to have its own page. AnmaFinotera (talk) 14:14, 28 January 2008 (UTC)
The new Animal Planet logo won't make its appearance until tomorrow or Sunday.
The new Animal Planet logo won't make its appearance until tomorrow or Sunday. It will replace the 12-year-old elephant and globe logo. AdamDeanHall (talk) 21:43, 1 February 2008 (UTC)
Three letter abreviation
what would be nice is if someone could put down the three letter abreviatoin for animal planet. For example NFL and so forth. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.143.3.182 (talk) 22:33, 29 March 2008 (UTC)
Content
I think this page might benefit from more information about its programming - some sort of attempt to characterize it more clearly but succinctly, in addition to how that programming has evolved since the channel started. I think that quote about the nature of the recent change is relevant - but left me feeling like that section was kind of incomplete. I actually did a fairly lengthy paper on Animal Planet as documentary in graduate school - it's one of those topics that on the one hand seems like irrelevant pop culture, but the closer you look at it, there's a lot to it. It's also a fairly popular and widely-viewed channel, despite the ratings drop mentioned in the article.Sinderbloog (talk) 17:18, 30 May 2008 (UTC)
--Also, while I know I should complain less about changes that need to be made and should just attempt making them myself (time, time,...), I do think it's odd that some of the pages for individual shows on the channel are actually of comparable length to the channel's page. Thoughts about sections to add? A response or reception section? More on revenues/business end of the channel? Pop culture references? Part of the problem, as always, is sources -- there isn't much secondary source material on the subject, a problem I ran into while trying to write a paper on it. Sinderbloog (talk) 17:32, 30 May 2008 (UTC)
animal ecology
hi! im sajid a student of zoology. i wondered if anyone of u can help me with my school assignment. i m supposed to submit the assingment on ecology of @least 2 animals 4m each phylum. i would be v.greatfull 4 ur help.ur help is being awiated @ sajidn@yahoo.com with regards sajid naqvi —Preceding unsigned comment added by 202.125.143.76 (talk) 12:54, 21 June 2008 (UTC)
animal ecology
hi! im sajid a student of zoology. i wondered if anyone of u can help me with my school assignment. i m supposed to submit the assingment on ecology of @least 2 animals 4m each phylum. i would be v.greatfull 4 ur help.ur help is being awiated @ sajidn@yahoo.com with regards sajid naqvi —Preceding unsigned comment added by 202.125.143.76 (talk) 13:00, 21 June 2008 (UTC)
Who took down my edits and why?
Who took down my edits about severe favoritism of dogs on Animal Planet? It may be an opinion but its true. Animal Planet has 50 shows about dogs but only 1 about cats. I'm putting it back up. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Tomcat4680 (talk • contribs) 09:07, 17 August 2008 (UTC)
The elephant logo
I think the logo used 1996-2008 is very significant to the subject, and that it should be included in the article. It is especially significant when talking about the relaunch in 2008, when the network wanted to shed the perception of them being "paternalistic, preachy, and observation-based". As mentioned in the article, this included getting rid of the old logo, which could be described as academic, boring, stoic, messy etcetera. This cannot be conveyed adequately without an image of the old logo.
The spirit of WP:NONFREE and WP:LOGOS is more targeted at avoiding using logos as mere decorations without relevance to the article text, which isn't the case here. Väsk (talk) 14:59, 28 July 2009 (UTC)
- The old log is not significant in the context of the article, nor does the article make the claims you've indicated about the old logo, only that it was replaced as part of the image redo. The logo is not necessary to convey that the channel's image was changed. -- AnmaFinotera (talk · contribs) 15:25, 28 July 2009 (UTC)
- What you interpreted as false claims about the content about the article, was me trying describe how one could "feel" about the logo. My point was that this can never be adequately expressed neutrally and that it is therefore better to include the logo in the article and let the readers judge for themselves.
- This is a quote from the article, with the parts that make me think an image is needed in bold:
- On February 3, 2008, Animal Planet "relaunched" itself under a new image that "sheds its soft and furry side for programming and an image with more bite." As part of the relaunch, Animal Planet replaced their elephant and spinning globe logo for a starker text image that allows more flexibility in its usage.
- How best to show what this "soft and furry side" looked like? How best to show what the current image has "more bite" than? How best to show what the current logo is starker than? How best to show what "allowed less flexibility" than the current logo? And does the reader understand what "their elephant and spinning globe" is? Väsk (talk) 17:32, 28 July 2009 (UTC)
- The logo does not express their shedding this. It is the change in programming, detailed in the section, that goes into how it changed its image. Image, in this case, is not logo, its what it projects as a channel and the type of content. And no, an elephant and a spinning globe do not need showing. That is a perfectly adequate description of two common items. -- AnmaFinotera (talk · contribs) 20:46, 28 July 2009 (UTC)
Proposed merge with Animal planet l!ve
channel is a subsidiary of Animal Planet Funnyfarmofdoom (talk to me) 13:47, 19 April 2013 (UTC)
- Oppose merge - the other article is large enough and on a distinct enough topic to justify a stand-alone article. (Note: since this discussion was never concluded, I have reverted removal of the merge templates from the two articles and unarchived this discussion.) Yngvadottir (talk) 19:43, 7 January 2015 (UTC)
Assessment comment
The comment(s) below were originally left at Talk:Animal Planet/Comments, and are posted here for posterity. Following several discussions in past years, these subpages are now deprecated. The comments may be irrelevant or outdated; if so, please feel free to remove this section.
| ==Assessment, August 12 2007== Re-assessed from high importance to low importance for the BBC WikiProject. Bearing in mind that the BBC broadcasts and produces hundreds of thousands of different shows, and that, compared to some like Doctor Who this isn't highly notable, a 'low' rating really is appropriate here. TheIslander 13:57, 12 August 2007 (UTC) |
Last edited at 13:57, 12 August 2007 (UTC). Substituted at 14:14, 1 May 2016 (UTC)
Pit bull service dogs
Has anyone ever rescued the Pit Bull breed from shelters and tried to train them for service dogs? If not they make great Emotional support dogs for PTSD, our veteran's. Pit Bulls are not bad like everyone portrays them to be some are not able to make service dogs or emotional support dogs. Because they have been abused or fought, but some are euthanized because of their breed. Dhardin71 (talk) 06:41, 11 September 2016 (UTC)
External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 3 external links on Animal Planet. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110503215455/http://www.bbcworldwide.com/annualreviews/review2006/BBCWWAnnual%20Review2006.pdf to http://www.bbcworldwide.com/annualreviews/review2006/BBCWWAnnual%20Review2006.pdf
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110816125823/http://www.cctvcoop.com/listChannels.aspx to http://www.cctvcoop.com/listChannels.aspx
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20080205080529/http://corporate.discovery.com/news/press/08q1/animal-planet-011408.html to http://corporate.discovery.com/news/press/08q1/animal-planet-011408.html
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 06:30, 6 July 2017 (UTC)
A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion
The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:
Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 09:38, 26 September 2020 (UTC)
A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion
The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:
Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 06:15, 30 June 2021 (UTC)
Commons files used on this page or its Wikidata item have been nominated for deletion
The following Wikimedia Commons files used on this page or its Wikidata item have been nominated for deletion:
Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 23:36, 23 June 2022 (UTC)
Essay about animal planet
Hhrh 2402:4000:2380:6CE:B4F7:EB84:59B3:78D7 (talk) 03:48, 2 October 2022 (UTC)