Talk:Angomonas deanei

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Angomonas deanei. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20160304003750/http://taxonomicon.taxonomy.nl/TaxonTree.aspx?id=943 to http://taxonomicon.taxonomy.nl/TaxonTree.aspx?id=943
• Added {{dead link}} tag to http://www.taxareference.com/taxon.php?d=eukaryota&t=59799

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 04:30, 14 October 2016 (UTC)

Taxoboxes

@YorkshireExpat: it seems to be the norm to have one taxobox per article – covering the single taxon covered in the article. I think it would be better to have a separate article on Kinetoplastibacterium crithidii. Peter coxhead (talk) 19:56, 20 December 2022 (UTC)

@Peter coxhead I was just fixing an error in the taxobox that was there. Maybe the candidatus shoudln't be bold in that case? YorkshireExpat (talk) 20:36, 20 December 2022 (UTC)

Oh, I see, you removed a second taxobox. Didn't even realise that was there to be honest. YorkshireExpat (talk) 20:40, 20 December 2022 (UTC)

@YorkshireExpat: ah, sorry, I just saw that you had edited last and that the article showed up in a taxobox error-tracking category. Yes, it was the second taxobox that was causing the problem – it's actually quite tricky to set up taxoboxes for species with non-binomial names. I agree about bold. Peter coxhead (talk) 20:44, 20 December 2022 (UTC)

For the record, this is what I think the offending second taxobox was trying to show. You need to use {{Automatic taxobox}}. Whether the formatting is correct for a candidatus bacterial species I don't know.

A. deanei endosymbiont
Scientific classification
Domain:	Bacteria
Phylum:	Pseudomonadota
Class:	Betaproteobacteria
Order:	Burkholderiales
Family:	Alcaligenaceae
Genus:	Ca. "Kinetoplastibacterium"
Species:	Ca. "K. crithidii"
Binomial name
Ca. "Kinetoplastibacterium crithidii" Du et al. 1994 in Teixeira et al. 2011, candidatus name