This article is within the scope of WikiProject Politics of the United Kingdom, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Politics of the United Kingdom on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Politics of the United KingdomWikipedia:WikiProject Politics of the United KingdomTemplate:WikiProject Politics of the United KingdomPolitics of the United Kingdom articles
This article has been automatically rated by a bot or other tool as Stub-class because it uses a stub template. Please ensure the assessment is correct before removing the |auto= parameter.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Iraq, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Iraq on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.IraqWikipedia:WikiProject IraqTemplate:WikiProject IraqIraq articles
Latest comment: 14 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
As both countries were constitutional monarchies and neither king actually signed the treaty, it seems rather medieval to describe it as a treaty between the Kings. In fact the treaty was negotiated between the governments but in the name of the kings. Dabbler (talk) 15:03, 18 August 2009 (UTC)Reply
Latest comment: 10 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
Given that the full text is in Wikisource which is referenced in the article, would it not be better to just highlight the most important articles, and/or the ones which seriously affected later events such as the military provisions? Dabbler (talk) 01:40, 27 June 2013 (UTC)Reply
.svg){kind=small}
