Talk:Angélica Fuentes/Archives/2015
 | This page is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Edit Request
 | This edit request by an editor with a conflict of interest was declined. |
Below are updated sections for Angelica Fuentes' page. These can replace the "Previous Positions" and "Philanthropy" sections as it outlines a more detailed summary of Angelica Fuentes' rise as one of the most powerful businesswomen in Mexico, along with information that may be of interest to the public about her philanthropic works.
The Career section can replace the "Previous Positions" section as it starts with the beginning of her career and goes through the positions she's held at different companies and the organizations she has founded since. For her philanthropy work, the Angelica Fuentes Foundation has been highlighted as well as honors and international recognition which includes much of her philanthropic work.
- Hi. I recommend putting this in a user-space draft at: User:Cvillasmil/sandbox and sharing a link to it here. The problem is it is difficult to review a big block of text and it would require extensive coding/formatting by a reviewer before it is ready for article-space. You can also use HTML like <b> and <s> to identify deletions and added content if you like. One thing I noticed off the bat is that we do not allow social media links in the External Links section. CorporateM (Talk) 23:47, 19 January 2015 (UTC)
- Thanks for the suggestion. We've now put in a request for review at User:Cvillasmil/sandbox. Thank you! — Preceding undated comment added 19:10, 26 January 2015 (UTC)
It still needs more formatting to be reasonably reviewed. Sub-sections should have two equals signs on either side. The first reference I tested was a broken link. Ideally you would use citation templates[1], but the sources should at least identify the publication so we can review which sources you're using without clicking on each one. I went to the "Honors" section, as such sections are almost always promotional and unwarranted, and found that it relied exclusively on primary sources. Her Twitter profile is not a credible, independent source and cannot be used. Nor can BusinessWire or other Wikipedia pages. Almost everything in the article should be cited to credible, independent sources, like professional journalists. Clicking around a bit more, many of the other sources are broken links as well. CNN is an example of an acceptable source. CorporateM (Talk) 15:23, 10 February 2015 (UTC)