This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Chicago, which aims to improve all articles or pages related to Chicago or the Chicago metropolitan area.ChicagoWikipedia:WikiProject ChicagoTemplate:WikiProject ChicagoChicago articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Illinois, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Illinois on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.IllinoisWikipedia:WikiProject IllinoisTemplate:WikiProject IllinoisWikiProject Illinois articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Baseball, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of baseball on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.BaseballWikipedia:WikiProject BaseballTemplate:WikiProject BaseballBaseball articles
Latest comment: 10 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
A claim such as this should be properly sourced according to "WP:BLPSOURCES" regardless of whether it is true. Without a proper source, this edit amounts to nothing more than rumor and innuendo and may even be defamatory towards Dahl and it should have been removed way before now. Therefore, I have immediately removed it per "WP:BLPREMOVE", "WP:UNSOURCED" and "WP:LIBEL". If a "reliable source", preferably a "third-party source", which supports this claim can be cited then it may be possible to re-add. Even so, I still have concerns as to how relevant this information it is to the understanding of the article or if it's simply meant as an attack against Dahl. Something as contentious and controversial as this should be discussed and a consensus reached before being re-added per "WP:BLPSOURCES" and "WP:BURDEN". - Marchjuly (talk) 05:44, 5 August 2014 (UTC)Reply
