Andrias scheuchzeri is part of WikiProject Amphibians and Reptiles, an effort to make Wikipedia a standardized, informative, comprehensive and easy-to-use resource for amphibians and reptiles. If you would like to participate, you can choose to edit this article, or visit the project page for more information.Amphibians and ReptilesWikipedia:WikiProject Amphibians and ReptilesTemplate:WikiProject Amphibians and Reptilesamphibian and reptile articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Palaeontology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of palaeontology-related topics and create a standardized, informative, comprehensive and easy-to-use resource on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PalaeontologyWikipedia:WikiProject PalaeontologyTemplate:WikiProject PalaeontologyPalaeontology articles
This article was reviewed by member(s) of WikiProject Articles for creation. The project works to allow users to contribute quality articles and media files to the encyclopedia and track their progress as they are developed. To participate, please visit the project page for more information.Articles for creationWikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creationTemplate:WikiProject Articles for creationAfC articles
This article was accepted on 30 March 2008 by reviewer Acer (talk·contribs).
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Teylers, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Teylers Museum on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.TeylersWikipedia:WikiProject TeylersTemplate:WikiProject TeylersTeylers articles
Latest comment: 6 years ago2 comments1 person in discussion
Homo diluvii testis cant be a synonym of Andrias scheuchzeri, since Scheuchzer identified the remains as belonging to a man. The expression Homo diluvii testis (The man who was witness of the Deluge) is just the title of the book, which must be taken as if it were the headline of a newspaper news, not as a taxonomic identification.
On the other hand, there cant be synonyms (or species names) prior to 1758, date of the publication of the tenth edition of the work of LinnaeusSystema Naturae, origin of modern zoological nomenclature. --PePeEfe (talk) 18:11, 13 April 2018 (UTC)Reply
I remove it from the taxobox. --PePeEfe (talk) 18:21, 13 April 2018 (UTC)Reply
