Talk:Andrew Tan

Latest comment: 2 years ago by Cunard in topic Did you know nomination

Clarence S. B. Tan edit

Is Andrew related to Clarence? Any input to the article on Clarence S. B. Tan would be greatly appreciated. //Urbourbo (talk) 08:23, 31 October 2008 (UTC)Reply

Honestly, I'm not sure. I have read a number of articles in the web about Andrew Tan but none of them have any references to Clarence S. B. Tan. FoxLad (talk) 09:36, 31 October 2008 (UTC)Reply
OK thanks anyhow for answering. Would be fun with more information about Clarence Tan, as even the Swedish press does not seem to know anything more about this obviously very wealthy man. All the best, //Urbourbo (talk) 09:42, 31 October 2008 (UTC)Reply

Need to clean up this stub to read like an encyclopedia article Paolocarlomarco (talk) 09:55, 29 July 2012 (UTC)Reply

External links modified edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Andrew Tan. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 09:26, 13 October 2016 (UTC)Reply

External links modified edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Andrew Tan. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 11:48, 5 July 2017 (UTC)Reply

Did you know nomination edit

The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: withdrawn by nominator, closed by Cunard (talk) 04:36, 6 June 2021 (UTC)Reply

  • ... that when Kevin L. Tan became "the youngest chief executive among major Philippine conglomerates", he was at a wedding and did not know about his own appointment?
    1. Flores, Mikhail (2018-06-05). "Philippine tycoon Andrew Tan steps aside for son. Alliance Global's new leader becomes youngest among country's conglomerates". The Nikkei. Archived from the original on 2021-05-16. Retrieved 2021-05-16.

      The article notes: "Philippine tycoon Andrew Tan resigned Monday as chief executive of Alliance Global Group, and the family-run conglomerate named his son as the company's new CEO. Kevin Tan, 38, was appointed CEO effective Monday, while his 68-year-old father remains as Alliance Global's chairman. The son becomes the youngest chief executive among major Philippine conglomerates."

    2. Lara, Tanya T. (2018-07-04). "Kevin Tan sees merging of malls, e-commerce and tourism". The Philippine Star. Archived from the original on 2021-05-16. Retrieved 2021-05-16.

      The article notes: "At 38, Kevin may be the youngest tycoon in the country as his appointment to AGI’s top post makes him responsible for the investment holding company that his father, billionaire Dr. Andrew L. Tan, founded. ... Even though he has worked alongside his father since he was 21 and from day one he was being groomed to succeed him, the announcement of his promotion still came as a surprise to him. Literally. “I was attending a wedding abroad and I got a lot of messages congratulating me. I thought, for what? Then I looked at my email. My dad had emailed the board that we were going to announce some changes in the company and that was one of them — that I was being appointed as the new CEO.”"

Created by Cunard (talk). Self-nominated at 12:13, 16 May 2021 (UTC).Reply

  •   Hook good, QPQ good. Article is DYK-appropriate, although the template is a little wrong here as Cunard isn't the creator -- he rewrote it after it turned out the prior text was copyvio. Nonetheless, that's nitpicking. The problem is this is currently the subject of a nasty AfD (I found it a day or so ago while looking at where one of my essays is linked from and went "holy hell, I'm not touching that"). It looks as though it's going to be a "some poor admin writes a three-paragraph rationale for 'no consensus'" situation; will approve or decline when the chips fall where they may. Vaticidalprophet 14:10, 20 May 2021 (UTC)Reply