Talk:Andrew Roraback
| This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Andrew Roraback article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
| Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
| Archives: 1 |
| This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
 | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||
Huge deletion edit
I came to the article bcz of my personal vagueness about who Roraback is; my memory was too vague to distinguish him from the Orange County pol with a presumably closely related surname. That much was easy, but i was unwilling to add the HatNote Dab w/o also responding to the difference between a WP article and what was, regardless of any nuance of intents of the previous contributors, at core a resume-style campaign document.
In a WP w/ a lot more eyeballs available, i'd rather have winnowed thru the platform for the talking points that have actually been recognized as significant to the current race, and have contributed to developing substantive content on the issues that will decide the outcomes of the convention, and perhaps a primary, and perhaps the general election. In the real WP, the real me can't sustain that interest, and i think the arguably gaping hole i've left at the end of the article serves better than letting it appear that his campaign's wording of his campaign's attempt to set the agenda succeeds in determining what in his program is worthy of attention.
BTW, the content i deleted remains available here or here, and it shouldn't be too hard to track down press accounts of the same planks, where said plank is of interest to those not involved in steering his campaign. (And older revisions affecting that section -- available via the article's Hx page -- may also be of interest.)
--Jerzy•t 18:37, 18 May 2012 (UTC)
Petit edit
Surely the criticism of Roraback by Dr. Petit, and e.g. Colin McEnroe's apparently non-partisan defense of Roraback is the kind of real political-career news that should probably be reflected in the article, perhaps even after this campaign is over.
--Jerzy•t 18:37, 18 May 2012 (UTC)
Cousin of Catherine Roraback edit
The famous attorney that defended Ericka Huggins in the Black Panther Party murder.. is his cousin. Where do I put it? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.38.221.52 (talk) 21:02, 4 October 2012 (UTC)