Talk:Andrew Robathan

Learn more about this page

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Andrew Robathan article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.

If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.

This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Biography: Military / Politics and Government

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
	This article is supported by the military biography work group (assessed as Low-importance).
	This article is supported by the politics and government work group (assessed as Low-importance).

University of Oxford Low‑importance

	University of Oxford portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject University of Oxford, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the University of Oxford on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.University of OxfordWikipedia:WikiProject University of OxfordTemplate:WikiProject University of OxfordUniversity of Oxford articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Military history: Biography / British / European / Cold War

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles

This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: criterion not met Coverage and accuracy: criterion met Structure: criterion met Grammar and style: criterion met Supporting materials: criterion met

Associated task forces:
/
	Military biography task force
	British military history task force
	European military history task force
	Cold War task force (c. 1945 – c. 1989)

Politics of the United Kingdom

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Politics of the United Kingdom, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Politics of the United Kingdom on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Politics of the United KingdomWikipedia:WikiProject Politics of the United KingdomTemplate:WikiProject Politics of the United KingdomPolitics of the United Kingdom articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Northern Ireland

	Northern Ireland portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Northern Ireland, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Northern Ireland on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Northern IrelandWikipedia:WikiProject Northern IrelandTemplate:WikiProject Northern IrelandNorthern Ireland-related articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.
	This article has been automatically rated by a bot or other tool because one or more other projects use this class. Please ensure the assessment is correct before removing the `\|auto=` parameter.

Ireland Low‑importance

	Ireland portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Ireland, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Ireland on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.IrelandWikipedia:WikiProject IrelandTemplate:WikiProject IrelandIreland articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Comment resoved edit

Latest comment: 14 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

This page originally read like a self-publicity page from a campaign website.

why have comments not complementary to he subject been removed? is the reverter the subject himself or a supporter?

facts are facts. Its a fact that the subject has consistently voted in Parliament against gay rights. The source is quoted. Its a fact that he proposed doubling of MP's salaries. The source is quoted. Its a fact that he claimed expenses for journals and magazines. the source is quoted. Its a fact that George Galloway made fun of his poor English grammar in his Commons suspension debate. The source from hansard is quoted and the video is on youtube.

if someone doesnt give a reasonable answer to the above, i will re-instate the edits. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 92.40.112.202 (talk) 08:25, 12 January 2010 (UTC)Reply

Hi, I reverted your change (someone else did so later too). My concern was the tone and that you went further than the references did in most cases. The tone was tabloid, not impartially presenting facts like encyclopedia would. And all the text added was negative - there was no attempt at a neutral point of view. Phrases like "Robathan was famously ridiculed in Parliament" jumped out (emphasis mine). The source was TheyWorkForYou (which means Hansard) - it can't show the "famously" part, it can only confirm what was said. I'd be worried about giving undue weight on the gay rights voting record based only on The Public Whip - TPW is auto-generated without much human sanity-checking - basically it's ok as a guide but not for shoving something in the lead.

That said, if you want to add some stuff with a more even-handed tone (even off some of the same references - the expenses stuff looks better, for example) then I'd encourage that. Otherwise I'll try and take a look at this at some point in the not-too-far-distant future. --h2g2bob (talk) 21:26, 12 January 2010 (UTC)Reply

Expenses edit

Latest comment: 11 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

I've looked at expenses allegations relating to a number of MP's on both sides. The first reference doesn't say very much at all and should be removed. I'll try and find the Telegraph article BUT in any case I believe employment of one relative was and still is permitted. I'll update article shortly hopefully applying WP:NPOV but feel free to comment.
JRPG (talk) 12:47, 20 October 2012 (UTC)Reply

Re Forces minister 'requested noisy fusiliers be ejected from Commons gallery' edit

Latest comment: 11 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

I note that this properly cited item has been removed. Of course, if it is wrong then it should be removed or shown as incorrect but its reasonable to want better proof than this, usually in the form of an apology. The Telegraph is regarded as a more reliable newspaper than the Mail and is reputed to check its facts. If Andrew Robathan has concerns, he should follow instructions on the Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons/Noticeboard. JRPG (talk) 14:08, 13 March 2013 (UTC)Reply

External links modified edit

Latest comment: 7 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Andrew Robathan. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 08:39, 13 October 2016 (UTC)Reply

External links modified edit

Latest comment: 6 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Andrew Robathan. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 17:58, 11 December 2017 (UTC)Reply

Add topic