Talk:Andrew Breitbart
 | The contentious topics procedure applies to this page. This page is related to post-1992 politics of the United States and closely related people, which has been designated as a contentious topic. Editors who repeatedly or seriously fail to adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, any expected standards of behaviour, or any normal editorial process may be blocked or restricted by an administrator. Editors are advised to familiarise themselves with the contentious topics procedures before editing this page. |
| This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Andrew Breitbart article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
| Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
Archives: Index, 1, 2Auto-archiving period: 60 days  |
 | This  level-5 vital article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
 | Text and/or other creative content from this version of Andrew Breitbart was copied or moved into Breitbart.com. The former page's history now serves to provide attribution for that content in the latter page, and it must not be deleted as long as the latter page exists. |
 | The following references may be useful when improving this article in the future: |
Attribution edit
Text and references copied from Orson Bean to Andrew Breitbart, See former article's history for a list of contributors. 7&6=thirteen (☎) 17:56, 9 February 2020 (UTC)
intro has odd unexplained references to things - removed edit
the intro had these words as part of the sentence about his Breitbart news site:
"along with multiple other "BIG" sites – BIGHollywood, BIGGovernment, BIGJournalism."
that is not self explanatory, so until someone can explain what that means, or what those are, it has been removed. Are they website names? are they just someone's idea of what he stood for or against? this isn't clear at all and needs to be expressed in a proper form. They were not links, and not expressed as .coms or other domain names. So, if you want that on there, at least let the public know what you are talking about. That would be proper journalism. Meat Eating Orchid (talk) 01:01, 5 October 2020 (UTC)
Cultural Marxism conspiracy theory has an RFC for possible consensus. A discussion is taking place. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments on the discussion page. Thank you. Emir of Wikipedia (talk) 20:08, 29 March 2021 (UTC)
Correction edit
Article has it right in opening paragraph, "conservative journalist"... Later in article he is called far right. This is wrong. 2603:6081:7600:1D00:388D:625E:9345:6AB0 (talk) 01:52, 21 January 2022 (UTC)
- If the reliable sources call him or his sites far-right, that's what we say here. We don't include original research. --SarekOfVulcan (talk) 02:15, 21 January 2022 (UTC)
Criticism and controversies section needed edit
(self explanatory) 120.21.18.26 (talk) 18:12, 5 October 2023 (UTC)
- No, per WP:CONTROVERSYSECTION. Self-explanatory. – Muboshgu (talk) 19:07, 5 October 2023 (UTC)
Some or Many. Journalists and academics don't all have the same opinion. edit
"....far-right news and opinion website, which has been described as misogynistic, xenophobic, and racist by academics and journalists."
"far-right news and opinion website, which has been described as misogynistic, xenophobic, and racist by SOME ? MANY academics and journalists."
Not every journalist in the world has the same opinion surely? 82.31.108.103 (talk) 11:44, 6 November 2023 (UTC)