Untitled edit

There may possibly need to be a disambiguation page with this former rugby player and war hero see [1]. Capitalistroadster 12:21, 13 June 2006 (UTC)Reply

This entry reads like it was written by one of Barr's staffers. Goldengulag (talk) 04:53, 18 March 2008 (UTC)Reply

Agree with Goldengulag that this page is written with a definate bias towards Barr probably by party supporters or office staff. Indeed some edits appear to have come from Dept of Education computers according to their IP addresses - the Toward 2020 school closures completely ignores the community anger over the issue focussing only on extra spending. Attempts to edit and add some neutrality of this section have always been overhauled - additionally the Towards 2020 section has been pushed to bottom of the page to minimise the controversy —Preceding unsigned comment added by 203.129.50.151 (talk) 21:15, 29 June 2008 (UTC)Reply

APPEARS TO BE PRO-ALP BIASED edit

- Above comment by 203.129.50.151 (talk) moved from article. - Gimboid13 (talk) 09:31, 30 June 2008 (UTC)Reply

What specific part of this article is biased? If you feel the article protrays Barr or his party in a positive light is this sufficient to call it biased? For example, Barr is protrayed as an advocate of homosexual rights - that is not bias its just something he has stood for, he has also stood for restructuring the schools system - something alot of Canberrans hate - but thats not bias either. Please be specific when placing bias tags. If you can't identify the nature of bias then perhaps its not evident. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Godianus the Finder (talkcontribs) 11:33, 11 July 2008 (UTC)Reply

Personally speaking I admire the guy, but the article reads like the guy's campaign website rather than an attempt to neutrally and encyclopaedically describe him per Wikipedia's core policies. Orderinchaos 14:38, 11 July 2008 (UTC)Reply

In response, the whole page over the last 2 years has been a blatant pro-ALP, pro-2020 school closure and pro-lets get Barr re-elected piece of dross. I had to laugh at the comment 'what part of this article is biased' - particulrly as it is followed by the implication that any criticism of Barr is deemeed as having a go at his homosexuality. Couldn't care if he is gay - just want him and the ALP to do their job - but they can't even run the schools, hopsitals or buses but we spend money on al grassby and GDE statues, give me a break. I note 3 months out from the ACT elections all the controversial stuff about Barr's 1st term has been stripped out - cleansed perhaps. Who took all this out anyway? Must be the ALP hacks in civic who created this piece of propaganda. Good riddance to bad rubbish I say - this guy wasn't even elected directly - he came 10th in a run off and closes a disproportionate number of schools in other electorates but rewards his alma mater with millions for performing arts - fuck off and get a real job I say and stop suckling on the public teat Alderman Barr.

Andrew Barr is the current ACT treasurer since July 2011. The article should be amended to reflect this fact. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 58.105.63.161 (talk) 07:28, 26 October 2013 (UTC)Reply

Wow edit

Barr appears set to become the first openly gay leader of a government in Australia. Bravo! Timeshift (talk) 01:23, 5 December 2014 (UTC)Reply

External links modified edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 4 external links on Andrew Barr. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 03:09, 13 October 2016 (UTC)Reply

External links modified edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Andrew Barr. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 05:58, 5 July 2017 (UTC)Reply

A Commons file used on this page has been nominated for speedy deletion edit

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page has been nominated for speedy deletion:

You can see the reason for deletion at the file description page linked above. —Community Tech bot (talk) 03:52, 8 April 2019 (UTC)Reply