Talk:Ancient Egyptian flint jewelry

This page was made to demonstrate the magnificent work of the human mind. I would be grateful if anyone could add an open source image of a flint bracelet or armlet.--Ashashyou (talk) 06:28, 14 May 2012 (UTC)

Speedy deletion issue

Dear all wikipedians, i think i am going to stop editing again on wikipedia, because the "voice tone" in many of the comments are aggressive. Perhaps it is a cultural issue, i thought English wikipedia was for all cultures but it seems i was wrong. Perhaps this explains the urge of some people to organize a workshop in Amman in April 2012 (postponed to unknown date) called "Middle Eastern Participation and Presence in Wikipedia" on its words:

"There are obvious gaps in access to the Internet, particularly the participation gap between those who have their say, and those whose voices are pushed to the sidelines. Despite the rapid increase in Internet access, there are indications that people in the Middle East and North Africa (MENA) region remain largely absent from websites and services that represent the region to the larger world."

Perhaps the loud, aggressive voice in some of the administrators on Wikipedia helps in the "the participation gap between those who have their say, and those whose voices are pushed to the sidelines".

I agologize again for any harm done, surely any person who reads the contributions would see the good intents (especially when metioning the original sources) of making people aware of this magnificent humanity heritage. The page is not less important than the many many many pages on other things to humanity. I thought wikipedia was for all humanity. Perhaps anyone could contribute to the article instead of just "nominating it for deletion" by adding a small tag on it. I do apologise again for the waste of your time and my time.

Hope wikipedia would develop to a more understanding community. --Ashashyou (talk) 13:50, 14 May 2012 (UTC)

The reason for the speedy deletion notice was simply that it was a copyright violation. This was explained to you before you posted the above. Other edits have also found copyright violations in other edits of yours. I don't think this is the cultural issue you think it is, although I know different cultures have different attitudes to copyright. Dougweller (talk) 11:35, 16 May 2012 (UTC)

I removed the PROD. The article seems to need fixed if there are copyright issues, but the notability has not been called into question. --Nouniquenames (talk) 16:37, 11 June 2012 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Ancient Egyptian flint jewelry. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120319003938/http://www.egypt.swansea.ac.uk/index.php/collection/297-ab29 to http://www.egypt.swansea.ac.uk/index.php/collection/297-ab29
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070611054659/http://homepages.uni-tuebingen.de/alfred.pawlik/Kom-al-Ahmar.pdf to http://homepages.uni-tuebingen.de/alfred.pawlik/Kom-al-Ahmar.pdf
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20140116073102/http://www.fitzmuseum.cam.ac.uk/explorer/index.php?oid=57625 to http://www.fitzmuseum.cam.ac.uk/explorer/index.php?oid=57625

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 19:34, 4 July 2017 (UTC)