Talk:Ancestry of the Godwins/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Tim riley (talk · contribs) 11:03, 3 April 2015 (UTC)

Only one quibble: the OED hyphenates "throne-worthy", and as the article meets all the GA criteria, in my view:

GA review summary

GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria

1. Is it reasonably well written?

   A. Prose quality:

   B. MoS compliance:

2. Is it factually accurate and verifiable?

   A. References to sources:

   B. Citation of reliable sources where necessary:

   C. No original research:

3. Is it broad in its coverage?

   A. Major aspects:

   B. Focused:

4. Is it neutral?

   Fair representation without bias:

5. Is it stable?

   No edit wars, etc:

6. Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?

   A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:

   B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:

7. Overall:

   Pass or Fail:

I gave this a first read-through yesterday evening, and rather flagged at the array of confusable names, but returning in the light of day I find all is crystal clear, with all the tangled skeins beautifully unpicked. A fine achievement. – Tim riley talk 11:03, 3 April 2015 (UTC)