Talk:Ancestry.com

Learn more about this page

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Ancestry.com article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Archives: 1: 28 days

This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Computing: Software / Websites Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Computing, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of computers, computing, and information technology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ComputingWikipedia:WikiProject ComputingTemplate:WikiProject ComputingComputing articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Software (assessed as Low-importance).
	This article is supported by WikiProject Websites (assessed as Low-importance).

Genealogy Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Genealogy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Genealogy on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.GenealogyWikipedia:WikiProject GenealogyTemplate:WikiProject GenealogyGenealogy articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the importance scale.

Companies Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Companies, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of companies on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CompaniesWikipedia:WikiProject CompaniesTemplate:WikiProject Companiescompany articles

Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

WikiProject Companies To-do:

Here are some tasks awaiting attention:

Article requests : Wikipedia:Requested articles/Business and economics/Companies
Assess : Category:Unassessed company articles
Copyedit : Category:Company articles needing attention
Infobox : Category:Company articles needing infoboxes
Maintain : Portal:Companies
Stubs : Help expand stub articles located at Category:Company stubs
Other :
- Tag company articles with the {{portal|Companies}} template
- Tag company talk pages with the {{WikiProject Companies}} project banner
- Answer requests for comments

The following Wikipedia contributor may be personally or professionally connected to the subject of this article. Relevant policies and guidelines may include conflict of interest, autobiography, and neutral point of view.

Nihonjoe (talk · contribs)

Newspaper.com listed at Redirects for discussion edit

Latest comment: 4 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Newspaper.com. Please participate in the redirect discussion if you wish to do so. _signed,Rosguill ^talk 02:26, 16 June 2019 (UTC)Reply

External link template edit

Latest comment: 3 years ago2 comments1 person in discussion

I propose adding the {{finance links historical}} template in the internal links section; this is pretty standard to have on formerly public U.S. companies such as this one. Any strong objections to my doing so? UnitedStatesian (talk) 17:47, 5 August 2020 (UTC)Reply

Hearing no response, I went ahead and added the template. UnitedStatesian (talk) 05:19, 22 August 2020 (UTC)Reply

Controversies edit

Latest comment: 1 year ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Two of these sections were here. The part about their ad is more recent. NYTimes not only ran it, but ran the topic more than once. Nuts240 (talk) 01:15, 19 July 2022 (UTC)Reply

Use by police edit

Latest comment: 7 months ago1 comment1 person in discussion

It is a major omission to not mention anything about the use of the web site by law enforcement. Whatever your beliefs, it is in the public interest that the public should know that their dna can be compared to relatives through ancestry.com without a warrant. A huge number of such requests have been granted. This is worth at least some mention. 2600:6C55:40F0:89A0:4D08:B64:3276:B24 (talk) 23:58, 23 September 2023 (UTC)Reply

Add topic