Talk:Anand Pillay
| This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||
| |||||||||||
 | This article contains a translation of Anand Pillay (Logiker) from de.wikipedia. |
Caleb Stanford (talk) 00:56, 4 November 2021 (UTC)
Initial review edit
@Kj cheetham: Many thanks for your initial review of the page!
I have a question about one thing. It's actually a question about how to interpret the Template:Like resume header in articles in general. I understand the idea, that the page reads like an academic biography, but what concrete steps would you suggest undertaking to improve this?
More generally, I see this template on a lot of different pages and IMO the template needs to be improved. Right now, it links to WP:RESUME which is a satirical essay saying, basically, don't post your own CV on Wikipedia. That's obvious, but doesn't say anything about what to do in cases of biographical articles that read like a resume. Ideally, it would link to a more helpful page with some suggestions. Caleb Stanford (talk) 15:46, 5 November 2021 (UTC)
- Hi Caleb Stanford, for this particular article, it was Htanaungg who added the Template:Like resume header rather than me, though I didn't remove it. To me, the article doesn't look like a resume, so I've been WP:BOLD and removed it. I tend to use that tag more for articles where it just gives a list of previous positions and/or research areas, rather than prose.
- To be honest, I agree the template itself could be improved, but I personally don't get involved with template design. I see you've posted on the template talk page though, so hopefully that helps prompt a change! -Kj cheetham (talk) 16:37, 5 November 2021 (UTC)
- That clears things up! Thank you for the response! Caleb Stanford (talk) 01:32, 6 November 2021 (UTC)