Talk:Amy Madison
 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Untitled
editThis text was removed:
- Plans had been made to have Amy as a reoccuring character in the Buffy spin-off Angel, but due to actress Elizabeth Anne Allen's unavailability, plans were abandoned and the character of Fred was created.
No source had been given. If anyone knows anything about this, in an interview or whatever then it could go back in with a mention of a source or a footnote (e.g. Whedon or someone on the show mentioning this fact in an interview or something), but otherwise how do we know if this is true or just rumour? -- Buffyverse 14:34, 24 April 2006 (UTC)
Species
editOK I have issue with species being given as Witch, her species is human, witch are not a different species to human, I have changed it so it says Human/Witch for the time being but I really think that the field in the infobox should just state her as human, after all the article explains that she's a witch.--NeilEvans 23:44, 9 April 2007 (UTC)
Romantic interests
editCan't the romantic interests section be folded into the main article?
The 'warren' information is duplicative. The larry bit could easily be put in in the point where she comes back.
Amy's species
editI have removed the info and left only Human as that is her species. Both Willoiw and Tara have Human and not witch. Also Amy's time as a rat was due to magic, and it is never stated that her species actually changed when she became a rat. Also if if "rat" is given as a former species then we should amend Giles' page and add former-Fyarl demon, as he became one for one episode.--NeilEvans 18:33, 7 June 2007 (UTC)
Fair use rationale for Image:Amymadisonbad.jpg
edit
Image:Amymadisonbad.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
Fair use rationale for Image:Amy madison.jpg
edit
Image:Amy madison.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
