 | This article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
 | This page has been transwikied to Wiktionary. The article has content that is useful at Wiktionary. Therefore the article can be found at either here or here (logs 1 logs 2.) Note: This means that the article has been copied to the Wiktionary Transwiki namespace for evaluation and formatting. It does not mean that the article is in the Wiktionary main namespace, or that it has been removed from Wikipedia's. Furthermore, the Wiktionarians might delete the article from Wiktionary if they do not find it to be appropriate for the Wiktionary. Removing this tag will usually trigger CopyToWiktionaryBot to re-transwiki the entry. This article should have been removed from Category:Copy to Wiktionary and should not be re-added there. |
Hyphen edit
Is this word properly hyphenated or not hyphenated or either? The article is inconsistent. Can someone run through the article and either hyphenate or un-hyphenate the word consistently throughout, as appropriate? Thanks. Also, the article states the the plural is amuse-bouche (with hyphen) and implies (from the opening line) that the singular is amuse bouche (without hyphen). This cannot be correct, is it ... that the pluralization of the term is noted by the addition of the hyphen ...? Thanks. (Joseph A. Spadaro (talk) 13:07, 13 July 2008 (UTC))
- Cited and done. -- JHunterJ (talk) 15:30, 14 October 2008 (UTC)
- Yes but done incorrectly. It is not consistently hyphenated. Once again the Hyphen King strikes. You really should research things before you go to town with your Centerville OH US grammar. http://www.google.fr/search?hl=fr&lr=lang_fr&tbs=lr%3Alang_1fr&q=Amuse+bouche&aq=f&aqi=g10&aql=&oq=&gs_rfai=
Vandalism edit
I removed a sentence about Andy Rice (supposed "protégé" of Gordon Ramsay) after I googled it and found no other references except on sites who are using info from WP. Contributions from this user [1] are all vandalism, but this one - along with another similar edit to Pearl Drums - weren't picked up at the time. Cormaggio is learning 16:19, 3 October 2009 (UTC)
Distinguishing amuse-bouche from canapé edit
It seems that these are much the same thing. Would a self-appointed expert on the subject like to make a distiction? 70.114.146.227 (talk) 16:34, 10 November 2013 (UTC) Eric
My impression is that an amuse bouche is a canapé that is (1) not ordered by the patron but instead presented as a sort of bonus, (2) usually served to seated patrons at a restaurant table, as opposed to passed on a tray, presented as part of a buffet, etc. ChickenFreak (talk) 06:31, 10 May 2015 (UTC)
"euphemistic hypercorrection" edit
Euphemistic I understand but I don't see how changing "snout-amuser" to "mouth-amuser" is hypercorrection.
An amuse-bouche is actually eaten by humans, not animals, so if it is any kind of correction it is not hypercorrection. And "euphemistic hypercorrection" must be a contradiction as a euphemism is, by its nature, a deliberate inaccuracy (for the sake of tact). If anything I would call it a plain old euphemism although it is more of a "posh way of saying". --87.224.68.42 (talk) 11:17, 29 July 2016 (UTC)
Blatant advertising edit
The https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Parmesan_Pannacotta_-_Amuse_Bouche_-_Lake_House_Restaurant,_Daylesford.jpg picture as the main image is just an advert for a restaurant to the point of having the address of the place it's served on it. Lawrie (talk) 22:26, 19 April 2020 (UTC)
