Talk:Amster Yard/GA1

GA Review

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

---

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Simongraham (talk · contribs) 07:14, 26 July 2021 (UTC)

This looks like another excellent article by Epicgenius. I enjoyed undertaking my last review and will attend to this shortly. simongraham (talk) 07:14, 26 July 2021 (UTC)

GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)

---

The article is clearly written and covers an interesting topic. It is stable, 91.7% of authorship is one user, Epicgenius. It is currently ranked a C class article.

1. It is reasonably well written.

   a (prose, spelling, and grammar): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):

   The article complies with the Manual of Style guidelines for lead, layout and word choice. I find no obvious grammar or spelling issues.

2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.

   a (reference section): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR): d (copyvio and plagiarism):

   Earwig's Copyvio Detector finds no copy write violations and all citations seem to be reliable.

3. It is broad in its coverage.

   a (major aspects): b (focused):

   The article covers the main aspects of the topic.

4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.

   Fair representation without bias:

   The article has a neutral point of view.

5. It is stable.

   No edit wars, etc.:

6. It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.

   a (images are tagged and non-free content have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):

   All images are tagged with Creative Commons licenses.

7. Overall:

   Pass/Fail:

Assessment

Congratulations. This article meets the criteria to be a Good Article.

Pass simongraham (talk) 07:16, 26 July 2021 (UTC)

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.