Talk:Amorphous (album)
Latest comment: 3 years ago by Buidhe in topic Requested move 1 March 2021
 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||
| ||||||||
Requested move 1 March 2021
edit- The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
The result of the move request was: Not moved (non-admin closure) (t · c) buidhe 00:54, 8 March 2021 (UTC)
Amorphous (album) → Amorphous – no other article with this name Jax 0677 (talk) 00:48, 1 March 2021 (UTC)
- This is a contested technical request (permalink). GeoffreyT2000 (talk) 03:54, 1 March 2021 (UTC)
- Oppose. Contested in the spirit of WP:PRIMARYRED. Being the only article with that name is not sufficient to show the subject is the WP:PRIMARYTOPIC. I am more than happy to reconsider my stance if the requestor has information I am unaware of. Thanks! Rotideypoc41352 (talk · contribs) 02:07, 1 March 2021 (UTC) changed to an official !vote 05:34, 1 March 2021 (UTC)
- Support No other topic by that name. A hatnote can be added to point to Amorphous solid. Walter Görlitz (talk) 07:38, 1 March 2021 (UTC)
- Strong oppose all Google results apart from a YouTube result appear to be for one of the generic meanings and Amorphous solid has 8,860 views compared to only 2 for the album[[1]]. The album clearly isn't primary by long-term significance and its unlikely to be by usage given the lead of the solid describes it as "amorphous" alone. Crouch, Swale (talk) 10:49, 1 March 2021 (UTC)
- Strong oppose, absolutely not the primary topic. The only thing that might be worthwhile to create is Amorphous (disambiguation) and then modify the hatnote at Amorphous solid to these different uses of the term amorphous. Polyamorph (talk) 13:07, 1 March 2021 (UTC)
- Strong oppose. per WP:PRIMARYRED In ictu oculi (talk) 15:30, 1 March 2021 (UTC)
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.