 | This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||
| |||||||||||
redirect/merge edit
Should we redirect to Faboideae and describe the tribes there? Unless the name Amorpheae is particularly well-known or there is something to say other than a list, I'm not sure it's worth having articles for all these secondary ranks. Does anyone see this article as becoming more than a list? ErikHaugen (talk) 16:46, 5 August 2010 (UTC)
- No. The tribe is notable in its own right. There's plenty that can be discussed about this tribe, including who first described it, relationship to other tribes, current and former circumscriptions, what sets it apart from other tribes, phylogenetic analyses, etc. Rkitko (talk) 02:34, 27 January 2011 (UTC)