Talk:Amistad Research Center
![]() | This article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Untitled
editYour article about the Amistad Research Center in your sandbox is excellent! I hope you publish it soon. Nolabob (talk) 01:17, 26 November 2016 (UTC):
- I have posted a question in the Village Pump about possibly moving this fine article.Nolabob (talk) 11:46, 27 December 2016 (UTC)
Nolabob and SwisterTwister, I might have second thoughts on the sandbox version. I realize, by reevaluating, that Draft:Amistad Research Center looks more sourced than the sandbox one. Let's decline the sandbox and try the other one instead. George Ho (talk) 20:43, 27 December 2016 (UTC)
- George Ho, How should we proceed? Thanks....Nolabob (talk) 21:09, 27 December 2016 (UTC)
- Waiting on SwisterTwister... George Ho (talk) 21:55, 27 December 2016 (UTC)
- Wait... what about WP:REPAIR? You can request moving a sandbox into the draft page. George Ho (talk) 23:39, 27 December 2016 (UTC)
- Yes, I can still accept and change the name from there, but I will relink the other Draft linked above to this one. SwisterTwister talk 04:03, 28 December 2016 (UTC)
User:SwisterTwister and Robert: Here is the other version, just in case that the reviewed version does not succeed. George Ho (talk) 05:24, 28 December 2016 (UTC)
SwisterTwister and George Ho, I have improved both the number and quality of the references used in this article. I have also improved the wording. Please critically review the article and provide your opinion on suitability for publication. Thank you, Nolabob (talk) 03:34, 16 February 2017 (UTC)
- @SwisterTwister: I submitted Nolabob's revision (recently) and Draft:Amistad Research Center (a month ago) for review. What can we do about this? George Ho (talk) 03:38, 16 February 2017 (UTC)