Talk:Amii Grove
| This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
 | This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Untitled edit
Don't delete the article. It needs expanding not deleting —Preceding unsigned comment added by Beckford14 (talk • contribs) 00:46, 3 February 2008 (UTC)
that pic is great, it should be kept
i agree with the comment above me, really shows what amii is all about
great pic! —Preceding unsigned comment added by Chubbyman99 (talk • contribs) 15:50, 1 March 2008 (UTC)
- Typing a comment and then pretending the subsequent comment is by somebody else isn't fooling anybody. The edit history shows that the picture, the comment about the picture, and the comment about the comment about the picture are all from Chubbyman99. And it is quite clear that the image posted is a scan from a magazine in violation of copyright. -- Whpq (talk) 14:09, 3 March 2008 (UTC)
Pornography portal links edit
The second paragraph of the article on Page 3 clearly states that there is a dispute about whether Page 3 girls are softcore pornography.
The link to the pornography portal is not an attempt to resolve this dispute, but merely a reflection that the dispute exists and therefore Page 3 girls are a topic of interest to the pornography project. --The Vintage Feminist (talk) 12:47, 26 August 2013 (UTC)