Talk:American VI: Ain't No Grave
![]() | This article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||
|
Critical Reception/Reviews
editJust leave the ratings in the sidebar as usual, will you? We shouldn't place them below it. It looks weird and isn't Wikipedia standard. Andy Pipkin (talk) 17:36, 22 February 2010 (UTC)
- Actually it is. BOVINEBOY2008 :) 18:47, 22 February 2010 (UTC)
- Please see here. —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 21:26, 22 February 2010 (UTC)
Proper addition of reviews
editPlease stop If reviews are added to the infobox, I will revert them. The Reviews
field of {{Infobox Album}} is deprecated in favor of text and the use of a different template. I will add those reviews to the proper section as time permits, but it would just be easier if other users who want to add reviews will do so in the proper fashion themselves. —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 22:47, 22 February 2010 (UTC)
- You have now violated the three-revert rule.BillyJack193 (talk) 22:51, 22 February 2010 (UTC)
- No I have not. You don't understand what that is, or you are making that allegation in bad faith. You're clearly being intransigent, so I'm going to have to ask for someone who has not been editing this article to give some attention to it. —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 23:06, 22 February 2010 (UTC)
- Oops, my mistake. For some reason, I felt you and another editor were the same person. But I looked at the revision history and indeed you did not. I apologize. The language in the article you originally posted was not clear. However, the article for the album templates was very clear and you were right. Again, I apologize (although, I will admit that I do not like the change in policiy).BillyJack193 (talk) 23:08, 22 February 2010 (UTC)
- All's well Thank you so much for reviewing the guideline and admitting that you were mistaken. It's a breath of fresh air to not have someone fight me every step of the way when applying a guideline. Accidents happen and I am happy to have someone else who wants to contribute to this article. —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 23:13, 22 February 2010 (UTC)
- Oops, my mistake. For some reason, I felt you and another editor were the same person. But I looked at the revision history and indeed you did not. I apologize. The language in the article you originally posted was not clear. However, the article for the album templates was very clear and you were right. Again, I apologize (although, I will admit that I do not like the change in policiy).BillyJack193 (talk) 23:08, 22 February 2010 (UTC)
- No I have not. You don't understand what that is, or you are making that allegation in bad faith. You're clearly being intransigent, so I'm going to have to ask for someone who has not been editing this article to give some attention to it. —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 23:06, 22 February 2010 (UTC)
I'm only asking this because you will find that the star ratings are in the infobox of every single article about a music album. And you have to admit that it looks way better that way. Some random examples:
- Dear Catastrophe Waitress
- Illionis
- Oh Mercy
- Transference
- American V: A Hundred Highways
- Invaders Must Die
I mean, is it really worth rewriting all those hundreds and hundreds of articles? If you must, have fun doing it, I just wanted to express my astonishment. Cheers. Andy Pipkin (talk) 15:47, 23 February 2010 (UTC)
- Consensus This is the consensus and it was reached recently, so you are correct that there are at least 70,000 album articles that are currently breaking it. Whether or not it's worth changing them is really contingent on whether or not you think consensus is worthwhile. As for the aesthetics, I definitely would prefer it in the infobox of this article, but once it gets more text to push down the critical reception section, that will fix itself. —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 16:27, 23 February 2010 (UTC)
- Also Some articles that do not have it (noticed that they are GA or FA):
- Etc. —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 16:28, 23 February 2010 (UTC)
I agree. Once there is more text it'll look better. Ok, so that's settled. Bye! Andy Pipkin (talk) 16:56, 23 February 2010 (UTC)
Reception
edit"...Cash's ability to record another solid collection of songs after his death..." The way this is worded makes it sound as if Cash recorded the songs after he died, which is ridiculous. --S-man 02:08, 5 March 2010 (UTC)
- Done. --S-man 5 March 2010 (UTC)
External links modified
editHello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on American VI: Ain't No Grave. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110721220412/http://www.buzzgrinder.com/2010/last-johnny-cash-american-recordings-album-to-be-released-in-february/ to http://www.buzzgrinder.com/2010/last-johnny-cash-american-recordings-album-to-be-released-in-february/
- Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.hitlisterne.dk/yearlist.asp
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}
).
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 13:57, 11 October 2016 (UTC)
Aint No Grave & The Undertaker
editWhen you read about most Albums on wiki, there usually is a section that talks about songs from that album in popular culture. This album's article makes no such effort, despite the fact that the song Aint No Grave has made several popular culture appearances, including the Undertaker's short term use of it as a theme for his entrance.
- The song has its own article and within that article, the Undertaker's use of the song is covered. If the song didn't have its own article, it might warrant a brief mention here but as it does have an article, it doesn't really need to be mentioned there AND here. NJZombie (talk) 03:16, 5 July 2021 (UTC)