Talk:American Ninja
| This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the American Ninja article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
| Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||
 | Plot descriptions cannot be copied from other sources, including official sources, unless these can be verified to be public domain or licensed compatibly with Wikipedia. They must be written in original language to comply with Wikipedia's copyright policy. In addition, they should only briefly summarize the plot; detailed plot descriptions may constitute a derivative work. See Wikipedia's Copyright FAQ. |
Fair use rationale for Image:American ninja.jpg edit
Image:American ninja.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.
If there is other other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 17:32, 31 May 2007 (UTC)
American Ninja Apprentice edit
I removed this from the "list of sequels" Canon themselves has stated that it's not related to the series. This is most likely due to them not having the IP rights for the series, which to me, says it doesn't belong here. After all you woulden't put the Asylum's Titanic II as a sequel to James Cameron's Titanic. --Deathawk (talk) 01:35, 20 February 2016 (UTC)
Mixed reception with critics? edit
The references suggest that the reception wasn't mixed but rather negative. What critics thought it was a good or even decent movie? - Tournesol (talk) 15:53, 22 January 2021 (UTC)
- Tournesol, it appears that the first sentence is inappropriately WP:SYNTHesized from three individual critics. That should be removed. However, Metacritic does show here that of five reviews, three were categorized as mixed, and two were categorized as negative. It's not a good sample size, but that breakdown could be shared in the article. The Rotten Tomatoes rating average of 3.6 out of 10 can be included too. Erik (talk | contrib) (ping me) 18:35, 22 January 2021 (UTC)