publisher blurbs not acceptable as wikipedia article edit

The article as it now stands consists of the publisher's blurb, a "review" from amazon.com which is actually more publisher blurbs, and two sentences from a newspaper article about Roberts which have nothing to do with the book. None of this is acceptable Wikipedia material. I will cut down on it and see if I can find real reviews. Rgr09 (talk) 22:53, 12 July 2020 (UTC)Reply