This article was reviewed by member(s) of WikiProject Articles for creation. The project works to allow users to contribute quality articles and media files to the encyclopedia and track their progress as they are developed. To participate, please visit the project page for more information.Articles for creationWikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creationTemplate:WikiProject Articles for creationAfC articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Companies, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of companies on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CompaniesWikipedia:WikiProject CompaniesTemplate:WikiProject Companiescompany articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Finance & Investment, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles related to Finance and Investment on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Finance & InvestmentWikipedia:WikiProject Finance & InvestmentTemplate:WikiProject Finance & InvestmentFinance & Investment articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions.
Latest comment: 5 years ago6 comments4 people in discussion
This page is not unambiguously promotional, because... (your reason here) --71.163.17.62 (talk) 14:06, 13 August 2018 (UTC)Reply
Seems like a page in development. Page seems informative and can be developed to comply with Wikipedia standards. I don't see a reason why it would be deleted so quickly. Why not give it some time and see what the author is planning to do with it. Seems like a serious and successful company and the information on the page seems well researched and informative. It is stating facts, so I do not see why it is flagged as purely promotional. 71.163.17.62 (talk) 14:06, 13 August 2018 (UTC)Reply
User:Legacypac, this is from last August, no one is saying it doesn't meet GNG, just that it is improperly sourced and needs NPOV editing and MOS fixes. Hell in a Bucket (talk) 18:53, 25 March 2019 (UTC)Reply
I was just responding to the inquiry at the helpdesk and leaving a comment that will stay here when the page goes to mainspace, which it should soon. Legacypac (talk) 18:54, 25 March 2019 (UTC)Reply
This is a legitimate multi billion dollar company which owned many famous brands. It merged with another company and is now defunct. Therefore the article is written in a historical and informative way. What is the point of having an encyclopedia article about a financial company if you are not allowed to put the companies finances in the article? Sources have been fixed. The complaint is that it sounds promotional because it touts the company's success, but the article clearly outlines the company's epic failures as well. Ksaraf (talk) 13:09, 2 May 2019 (UTC)Reply
