Talk:Amendments to the Constitution of Iraq
 | Amendments to the Constitution of Iraq was a Social sciences and society good articles nominee, but did not meet the good article criteria at the time. There may be suggestions below for improving the article. Once these issues have been addressed, the article can be renominated. Editors may also seek a reassessment of the decision if they believe there was a mistake. | |||||||||
| ||||||||||
 | This article has not yet been rated on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||
Article numbers edit
When editing the article numbers for the constitution, please bear in mind that different versions of the text have different numbering! AndrewRT(Talk) 12:39, 29 April 2007 (UTC)
Failed "good article" nomination edit
This article failed good article nomination. This is how the article, as of May 15, 2007, compares against the six good article criteria:
- 1. Well written?: First off, the lead for this article is insufficient. More than one should be used to explain what the article is about. Also, what's the point for the list of committee members? I don't see how it contributes significantly to the article.
- 2. Factually accurate?: Contains a variety of good sources.
- 3. Broad in coverage?: Lacking in thoroughness. A large section of the article is nothing more than a list of members of the committee. On that matter, I could not quite figure out what the article was supposed to be about. Does it have to do with a specific amendment to the Constitution of Iraq? Is it devoted to the process of amending the constitution? The committee that evaluates proposed constitutional amendments?
- 4. Neutral point of view?: I see no problems here.
- 5. Article stability? No significant updates since last December? Assuming no change has been made regarding constitutional amendments over there, such as new ones introduced, new processes, etc. (I honestly am not as aware of that information), then this is fine.
- 6. Images?: None included. Possible suggestions include committee meetings regarding amendments, documents proposing constitutional amendments, etc.
When these issues are addressed, the article can be resubmitted for consideration. If you feel that this review is in error, feel free to take it to a GA review. Thank you for your work so far. — Johnny06man 18:11, 15 May 2007 (UTC)
External links modified edit
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Amendment to the Constitution of Iraq. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added
{{dead link}}tag to http://portal.unesco.org/ci/en/files/20704/11332732681iraqi_constitution_en.pdf/iraqi_constitution_en.pdf - Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110104005553/http://parliament.iq/ to http://www.parliament.iq/
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 13:57, 3 July 2017 (UTC)