Ambulance now pushed back to April 8th edit

Deadline is now reporting Ambulance has moved to April 8th: https://deadline.com/2021/12/ambulance-release-date-change-jake-gyllenhaal-movie-1234891420/.

Hope we can add this into the movie's wiki page. — Preceding unsigned comment added by MarvelDisney20 (talkcontribs) 03:00, 15 December 2021 (UTC)Reply

@MarvelDisney20:   Done Special:Diff/1060375332. Some Dude From North Carolina (talk) 03:40, 15 December 2021 (UTC)Reply

Ambulancen edit

@Some Dude From North Carolina: "Ambulancen" is not the same word as "Ambulance". Why did you change "Ambulancen" to "film of the same name"? It's not the same name, it's a Danish name for a Danish film. 2001:BB6:4713:4858:21D1:E285:7E4E:F5F3 (talk) 19:15, 3 April 2022 (UTC)Reply

Genre edit

@Some Dude From North Carolina: I would agree with you on this, except heist films focus on the planning, execution, and aftermath of a large robbery (bolding my own), according to the heist film article (this is sourced, too). InfiniteNexus (talk) 00:54, 13 April 2022 (UTC)Reply

@InfiniteNexus: The film is not just about the heist. Most sources call it an action-thriller because that's what it is. It combines action genres (heist + chase) and fits the definition of an action-thriller: Featuring guns, explosions, elaborate, and apocalypse set pieces, ... these films often feature a race against the clock [and] lots of violence ... Though they may involve elements of crime or mystery films, those aspects take a back seat to the action. Some Dude From North Carolina (talk) 00:58, 13 April 2022 (UTC)Reply
I 100% agree with you that this film is an action-thriller. However, heist film is a more specific and accurate sub-genre of the aforementioned action-thriller genre, and the film clearly fits the definition of a heist film as well, as noted above. The entire plot of the film is centered around a heist, and that includes the two-hour long chase sequence. If you're still not convinced, here are some sources which call Ambulance a heist film: [1], [2], [3]. InfiniteNexus (talk) 02:54, 13 April 2022 (UTC)Reply
The entire plot of the film is centered around a heist. This is not true. The beginning is about the heist, the rest is about the police hunt / relationship between the brothers. The entire movie should not be classified as a heist film. Some Dude From North Carolina (talk) 03:34, 13 April 2022 (UTC)Reply
The police chase is the aftermath of the actual heist, which is why I said everything about the film is centered on (i.e. connected to) a heist. I once again point you to the opening paragraph of the heist film article. InfiniteNexus (talk) 03:46, 13 April 2022 (UTC)Reply
You might be right (though I would wait for someone else to chime in), but most sources call it an action-thriller because the chase is the main subject. I recall even Bay called it an action-thriller in one of his interviews. Some Dude From North Carolina (talk) 12:47, 13 April 2022 (UTC)Reply
Again, I'm not disagreeing with you that this film is an action-thriller. Heist film is a sub-genre of the action-thriller genre. For example, Star Wars (film) is labeled as a space opera, but that doesn't mean the film isn't a sci-fi film. Heist films chronicle the planning, execution, and aftermath of a large robbery. Ambulance chronicles the planning, execution, and aftermath of a large robbery. How is Ambulance not a heist film? InfiniteNexus (talk) 17:08, 13 April 2022 (UTC)Reply
Genres of Ambulance ranked from the most specific to the most generic: chase filmheist filmcrime filmaction-thriller filmthriller filmaction film. Because there is no article on chase film, heist film is our best option. InfiniteNexus (talk) 17:12, 13 April 2022 (UTC)Reply
Like I said, I'd wait for someone else to comment before making the change. Some Dude From North Carolina (talk) 17:15, 13 April 2022 (UTC)Reply
Sure. I was gonna try to ping a recent active editor, but judging by the page history you seem to be the most active one here, haha. InfiniteNexus (talk) 17:22, 13 April 2022 (UTC)Reply

GA Review edit

This review is transcluded from Talk:Ambulance (2022 film)/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Nineteen Ninety-Four guy (talk · contribs) 08:17, 12 May 2022 (UTC)Reply


Will be taking this one; I enjoyed this movie. Nineteen Ninety-Four guy (talk) 08:17, 12 May 2022 (UTC)Reply


Hi, I have begun reviewing the article and just finished with the entire Production. Though I'm happy to announce that this section mostly pass the GA criteria, I feel like the following texts fail criterion 2b for being either unsourced or failing verification against source provided:

*In 2020, the COVID-19 pandemic in Los Angeles affected Bay's career and canceled his plans to shoot his next film, Black Five. He recalled telling his agent "Goddamnit, I just want to get out and shoot something fast. I'm tired of being locked up at home".

  • The production also hired real trauma surgeons, firefighters, SWAT teams, snipers, and 52 LAPD officers for the shoot.

Will continue with the rest later. Nineteen Ninety-Four guy (talk) 06:50, 13 May 2022 (UTC)Reply

Okay, back to reviewing.

Sections from Release down to Reception pass criterion 2a. However, the following texts, while not necessarily unreferenced, need inline citations to maintain text-source integrity:

  • The first trailer was shown at CinemaCon on August 25, 2021
  • It was projected to gross $8–14 million from 3,412 theaters in its opening weekend
  • The film made $3.2 million on its first day, including $700,000 from Thursday night previews
Prose review
  • Ambulance received mixed reviews from critics who saw it as a return to form for Bay, though the story drew occasional criticism. -> please copyedit for this to be "well written". This needs citation, too
  • Ambulance has grossed $21.8 million -> fix double spacing in 21.8 million
  • and the Winter Olympics as well as re-runs of The Big Bang Theory. -> place a comma before as well as
  • Cam tries to convince Will to stop Danny to no avail -> comma before to no avail
  • Wikilink B movie
  • I believe there's one instance of "multiples [sic] sources" inline that needs fixing

Would be happy to give this article a pass once these issues are resolved. Nineteen Ninety-Four guy (talk) 06:57, 14 May 2022 (UTC)Reply

  • @Nineteen Ninety-Four guy: Done. Some Dude From North Carolina (talk) 17:38, 16 May 2022 (UTC)Reply
    • Thank you. I'm happy with the changes overall, though I had to do some minor ones here in there. I'm therefore pleased to announce that this article has passed the Good Article criteria. It's well-written and sourced, broad, neutral, stable, and supported with licensed images. You may be interested in nominating the article for WP:DYK, as it's a newly-promoted GA. Nineteen Ninety-Four guy (talk) 07:42, 19 May 2022 (UTC)Reply

Deliberately Ignoring a MOS like WP:FILMCAST at a WP:GA Is a Bad Look edit

I'm looking at you Some Dude From North Carolina. There is no justification to not use Eiza Gonzalez's credited name from the film, especially as not doing so actually increases reader confusion (e.g. the poster art at this very article spells her name "Gonzalez" not "González"). And sources at the article look to be split about 50-50 on the spelling. In that case, the "tie-breaker" should go to the film's credits.

Not doing, and ignoring WP:FILMCAST this strikes me as a WP:IDONTLIKEIT kind of edit. Consider this my objection to not following the credited name. --IJBall (contribstalk) 01:07, 30 May 2022 (UTC)Reply

Hello. The "á" and the "a" are different letters and a big difference for Latin speakers. Her name has the "á" so I would use the "á". MOS:TYPOFIX says typos can be fixed. "Insignificant spelling and typographic errors should simply be silently corrected." Some Dude From North Carolina (talk) 01:15, 30 May 2022 (UTC)Reply
Yeah, no, that's not right at all. In fact, this is someone who goes by two names. This is why WP:NOTBROKEN exists – because, for example, there are actors who have gone by more than one name over the course of their career. The fact is Gonzalez and her agent control how her name is spelled in crediting – IOW, they deliberately chose to have her name spelled Eiza Gonzalez in the credits (i.e. the American English way) rather than as Eiza González (the Spanish way). Note that she has been previously credited using the American English spelling before, e.g. recently in Hobbs & Shaw (though that article is also not following WP:FILMCAST on this). Bottom line: This is clearly not a "typographical" error, but is a deliberate choice on Gonzalez, et al's part to spell her name "Gonzalez" in American English-language film roles. We should be following WP:FILMCAST here, not substituting the preferences of Wikipedia editors over Gonzalez, her representation and the film's producers. --IJBall (contribstalk) 14:59, 30 May 2022 (UTC)Reply

"Ambulance (upcoming film)" listed at Redirects for discussion edit

  The redirect Ambulance (upcoming film) has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Readers of this page are welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 March 5 § Ambulance (upcoming film) until a consensus is reached. Steel1943 (talk) 21:47, 5 March 2023 (UTC)Reply